My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
WSP11789
CWCB
>
Water Supply Protection
>
Backfile
>
11000-11999
>
WSP11789
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/26/2010 3:18:52 PM
Creation date
10/12/2006 5:10:34 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Water Supply Protection
File Number
8101
Description
Arkansas River Basin
State
CO
Basin
Arkansas
Water Division
2
Date
2/10/1938
Author
CWCB
Title
Arkansas River at Holly - 1910
Water Supply Pro - Doc Type
Data
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
70
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />00C598 <br /> <br />-2- <br />krk. River at Rolly,Extrame Inscharges Jan. & Feb.,1910 Cont'd. <br /> <br />A miscellaneous measurement was also made on the Arkansas River <br /> <br />at La Junta on January 23, 1910 showing a discharge of 635 second-feet. <br /> <br />The original official record in the State Engineer's office gives <br /> <br />a discharge of 700 second-feet for January 23, 1910. For the day before <br /> <br /> <br />and the day following discharges of more than 4,000 second-feet are giv- <br /> <br />en. The 700 second-foot quantity corresponds with the wBasurement made <br /> <br />by Thomas Grieve on January 22nd. Mr. Grieve also noted ice conditions <br /> <br />in January. The previous and following discharges are, therefore, ap- <br /> <br />parently in error, including all figures back to December 31, 1909 and <br /> <br />the figures after January 23rd to about Februa'J' 18th or 19th. <br /> <br />A summary of s-tream flows in the Arkansas drainage was made by <br /> <br />-the sta-te Engineer's office in 1926. The attached copy of the Rolly <br /> <br />record of this summary shows the record for the months of January and <br /> <br />Februar~l', 1910 very greatly modified~ The corrected values are fairly <br /> <br />high, but the analysis of the Monthly Weather Review, copy of which <br /> <br />is attached, shaws above normal precipitation and snowfall for the months <br /> <br />of November and December, 1909. The values shO\m on this summary are al- <br /> <br />so in line with the Pueblo and Canon City records for this year, which <br /> <br />are considerably above normal. <br /> <br />,Notes in red pencil on the original official record in the State <br /> <br />Engineer's office indicate that no correction for ice conditions had <br /> <br />been made. The figure 15,000 acre-feet for January, 1910 and 13,000 <br /> <br />acre-feet for february, 1910 are given. in pencil. These notations in <br /> <br />red are initialed"R.I.~, and are presumably.those of R. I. Meeker. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.