Laserfiche WebLink
<br />.~ <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />Reservoir Site, the construction of which he urges. The presently <br />estimated annual evaporation on these holding reservoirs is 800,000 acre <br />feet of which Colorado must bear 51.75%, to wit: 414,000 acre feet. Any <br />change of reservoir sites will decrease or increase this figure. <br /> <br />Note 6. Page 186, Bureau of Reclamation 1946 Report, House Document 419, 80th <br />Congress 1st Session. <br /> <br />~Jote 7. Page 186, same authority; showing existing and presently authorized <br />projects. These transbasin uses consist of the following: Grand River <br />Ditch, Moffat Tunnel, '{illiams River ~version, Twin Lakes Diversion, <br />Colorado-Big Thompson Diversion, and other existing small diversions. <br />In this computation, Colorado-Big Thompson has been scheduled at 310,000 <br />A.F. <br /> <br />Note 8. Report of Area Engineering Office Region IV. This is an increase of <br />44,400 acre feet over the amount presented to the Colorado Water Conserva- <br />tion Board by its engineering staff in December 1948. <br /> <br />Note 9. Present estimate on uncompleted study in progress by Area Engineering <br />Office, Region IV. This is an increase of 52,160 acre feet over the <br />amount presented to the Colorado Water Conservation Board by its engin- <br />eering staff in December 1948. <br /> <br />Note 10. This is the estimate furnished to the Colorado Water Conservation Board <br />by its engineering staff in December 1948 pending the completion of the <br />survey by Region IV, and based upon the error made by this engineering <br />staff in its report on the Colorado River and the Gunnison River is more <br />than 39% too low. Pending the completion of the Bureau Survey in Western <br />Colorado there is no better figure available. <br /> <br />Note 11. This is the estimate of Colorado Water Board staff in December 1948, and <br />although it is the best figure available until Region IV of the Bureau <br />has completed its study, this figure may be considered 39% too low for <br />the reason above set out. <br /> <br />Note 12. This is the estimate of Colorado Water Board Engineering Staff in Decem- <br />ber 1948 and eame observations apply as ~bove. <br /> <br />Note 13. This figure does not include municipal use in connection with synthetic <br />fuel development. No sufficient study has been made and it is believed <br />to be too small. <br /> <br />Note 14. This is the presently contemplated consumptive use of water of the paper <br />and pulp mill project to be located on the Colorado River West of Glen- <br />wood Springs. <br /> <br />Note IS. Mr. Boyd Guthrie in charge of the United States Shale experimental plant <br />in January 1949 at Grand Junction, Colorado, to the Colorado River Steer- <br />ing Committee, gave it as his opinion that the consumptive use of water <br />for processing shale at the rate of one million barrels per day, and for <br />the incident municipal use would be 268,000 acre feet of water per year. <br />Based upon his findings at the experimental plant, it' was his opinion <br />that such an operation would be in effect ~thin a decade, and that in <br />the event of war the peace time operation would be doubled or trebled. <br /> <br />-3- <br /> <br />2303 <br />