Laserfiche WebLink
<br />,. <br /> <br />2008 <br /> <br />General water-quality characteristics <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />The general water quality of the upper Arkansas River is influenced by many factors including ground <br /> <br />water, direct runoff from snowmelt or rainfall, mine drainage, Iransmountain diversions. and water use within the <br /> <br />basin. These factors result in distinct spatial and temP<Jra! patterns of surface-water quality in the area. The pH uf <br />the upper Arkansas River typically falls in the range 7.5-8.5 and tends to increase downstream. Due to the low <br />buffering capacity of snowmelt runoff, pH values tend to be smallest during this flow regime. Dissolved-oxygen <br />concentrations generally are near saturation throughout the basin. Alkalinity ranges fmm as low as 20-30 mg/L as <br />CaCO) in the upper reaches of the basin to about 170 mgJL near Portland. The smallest alkalinity occurs at Granite <br />and is a result of low-alkalinity inflow from Twin Lakes Reservoir. Alkalinity tends to be smallest during <br />snowmelt runoff and increases during other flow regimes. Throughout the upper basin, water in the Arkansas River <br /> <br />is a calcium bicarbonate water type, although the concentrations of the major solutes tend to vary spatially (Figure <br /> <br /> <br />3). Dissolved-solids concentrations are smallest in the upper reaches of the basin because of the predominance of <br /> <br /> <br />. chemically-resistant igneous and metamorphic rocks. Calcium and bicarbonate concentrations decrease about 40% <br /> <br /> <br />between Empire Gulch and Granite due to dilution by inflows from Lake Creek. Dissolved-solids concentrations <br /> <br /> <br />tend to increase downstream from Granite due to the increasing proportion of less chemicall y-resistant sedimentary <br />rocks in the tributary drainages. <br /> <br />Figure 3 near here. <br /> <br />During the study period. concenlrations of total-recoverable and dissolved metals exhibited substantial <br /> <br /> <br />spatial and temporal variability (Figure 4). Total-recoverable metals increased between Leadville and Empire <br /> <br /> <br />Gulch during all seasons presumably due to mine drainage. Between Empire Gulch and Granite. total-recoverable <br /> <br /> <br />metals decreased due to dilution by Lake Creek. Downstream from Granite, total-recoverable metal concentrations <br /> <br /> <br />generally decrea.~ed during all flow regimes except snowmelt runoff. Total-recoverable metal concentrations <br /> <br /> <br />. typically were largest during snowmelt runoff and tended to increase downslrcam from Granite. The increase in <br />9 <br />