Laserfiche WebLink
<br />002879. <br /> <br />CHAPTER 4. ENVIRONMENTAL CONSEQUENCES <br />;:::::,>lm:::::-:t:~~::>i::::';:;:,,;w~:::;'~:::~::::~%:~:::l:~W::m:;:::::~~w:~;;3,:;wm;::;:;:::;~:<<-?*;;:-;~~:::-.&::::::.:X;.::::::::;:-.:t<'";;;,:<<<:;::.,;>m~l>~;.~~':;:m:::,~~~,:;";::;~~;:;r;",>>;'.>;"y;m~;,,;l:i;..';::'m>::::::-;;:.:::~;;;;.'.I:i,5;,-::~:;:W'):;';';:0:.~;;;:<tj;:;l'S:;:$:,1"{~. <br /> <br />· During mobilization of heavy equipment through town, pilot cars should be used <br />for over-width vehicles <br /> <br />. A schedule should be developed to minimize supply truck travel through town <br />during peak morning hours and late afternoon hours when people are traveIling to <br />arid from work or school <br /> <br />. Supply trucks and heavy equipment should use City Route 1 (as defined in Section <br />3.10) because this route travels through less dense neighborhoods and traffic loads <br />are normally lighter <br /> <br />. Car pooling among those working at Fish Creek Reservoir should be encouraged <br />if a construction camp is not utilized <br /> <br />. An approved emergency hazardous waste spiIl response plan (describing procedures <br />to be implemented in case of a fuel or hazardous waste spill) should be submitted <br />to the Forest Service before any fuel or other hazardous material is transported <br />over the West Route <br /> <br />. Dust abatement would be required <br /> <br />In addition, to minimize the impacts to the road conditions along the West Route, the Applicant <br />should submit and implement a road maintenance plan which ensures that the surface of the roads <br />remain in the same condition as described in the Road Condition Survey (ReS) conducted in <br />October 1992 (ACZ, 1992e). This could include the replacement of damaged culverts and/or <br />drainage ditches, as well as the addition of suitable base material in areas significantly damaged by <br />heavy equipment. Road repair and maintenance would be approved and inspected by the Forest <br />Service. <br /> <br />As discussed previously, the Applicant and the County have prepared a MOU in which the <br />Applicant agrees to mitigate any construction-related damages to County roads. This MOU is <br />included in Appendix K, Project Mitigation. <br /> <br />Finally, it is suggested that Road Corridor Option 1 (as identified above) be used to replace the <br />inundated portion of FDR 310.2. Road Corridor Option 1 would disturb the least amount of land <br />and the least amount of wetlands, and would be less visible from the reservoir area than the other <br />two alternatives. Precautions should also be taken so that any material imported for the road <br />surfacing does not contain noxious weeds. Additionally, all road seaions that will no longer be <br />required after construction is completed should be properly reclaimed according to Forest Service <br />criteria. <br /> <br />4.10.5 Unavoidable Adverse Impacts <br /> <br />H Fish Creek Reservoir is expanded, under either Alternative B or Alternative C, there would be <br />no long-term unavoidable adverse impacts to either the West Route or the East Route. <br /> <br />:::;::::.:::;,~:-;~l.o..-.::-}~>~:{=:::::,?~~..:-=:~-rnz..m~~:>h';:;:~:::.:::'.;:::.:.:w.w.$l':':':,~-},%"?>>>~{'::::;:::::':",o.::~:,:;:,~':'~,~:::o;:~m>z.:v;:x~:~~.>:.;.:;~:.;~~::;..:,~:.:,,:'X-:-:.:v.<.;::<>>:',,:-~;,:y":<<-,;::.>>';:::~:-'?>>l<:::x:w.:::;:::;':'::";';~ <br /> <br />September 1993 <br /> <br />Page 4.)7 <br />