Laserfiche WebLink
<br />002878 <br /> <br />CHAPTER 4 . ENVIRONMENTAL CONSEQUENCES <br />?@'&:w.r:,$";:;~:>>::::;:;~r-.<<:..?w...r;$::$;Sw.'~:::':::?,@.:t;.:::;::.:;.';.:::-,~~~.::::~;;:::-,-:..,=;~=>>::;:;:~~,,::~:m.:~<:;:~~3;:.@<:::'~3;0.~::::m;:;m~;;.::;.:;:::;::...'W;:.-:::~~~,-:;~:::::W..>::;::':::~~"~::: <br /> <br />recreAtional bikers using FDR 60 and FDR 310 would also be affected during the construction <br />period. <br /> <br />As discussed in Section 3.10, access to the West Route (FDR 60) would be through the City of <br />Steamboat Springs. Because of this, increases in traffic and in the probability of an accident would <br />also occur along the designated city access routes identified in Section 3.10. <br /> <br />A final safety impact associated with the proposed project would be an increased chance of a <br />hazardous spill occurring along the West Route. During the construction phase, fuel trucks would <br />be traveIling along the West Route. Approximately 2.7 miles of roads along the West Route are in <br />close proximity to creeks or streams (as defined in Section 3.10). At locations where the West Route <br />is in close proximity to water resources, there would be a high probability that a spill could reach <br />a creek or stream before cleanup could be completed. <br /> <br />Road Conditions - Along the West Route, from Dry Lake Campground to Fish Creek Reservoir, <br />there are several sections of roads which have little or no base material. These areas, when wet, can <br />be soft and easily damaged. H a decision to expand Fish Creek Reservoir is made, the City would <br />remove snow from the West Route in the spring and would then transport the equipment required <br />for the proposed expansion to Fish Creek Reservoir. During the mobilization of this heavy <br />equipment, the road surface would likely be wet, and in soft areas where there is little or no base <br />material, damage to the roAd would likely occur. In addition, according to Section 3.10, there Are <br />several culverts along the West Route which have less than one foot of cover. During the <br />mobilization periods, there would be a high probability that these culverts would be damaged. <br /> <br />During the construction period of the Proposed Action supply vehicles would be using the West <br />Route daily. By this time, the roads should dry out and should be more conducive to handling an <br />increased load. Furthermore, the weight and size of the supply vehicles would be less than that of <br />the heavy equipment being moved initially. Thus, impacts which would occur to the roads during <br />the construction phase could be of a lesser degree than those impacts which would occur during the <br />mobilization of heavy equipment. However, because of rainfall, the roads would still be wet at <br />times and would continue to be susceptible to damage from the transport of equipment and supplies. <br />In addition, culverts with less than one foot of cover would also be prone to damage. <br /> <br />Routt County and the Applicant have developed a memorandum of understanding (MOD) <br />pertaining to site access via County roads. According to the MOU, the Applicant is responsible for <br />the mitigation of all impacts to county roads associated with construction activities. <br /> <br />New Road Construction - Under Alternative B, a portion of FDR 310.2 would be inundated. To <br />replace this portion of the road, the City has proposed three road corridor options as shown in <br />Figure 2-5. The preferred road alternative would be constructed using conventional equipment and <br />would be covered with gravel. There would be disturbances to wetlands, however, associated with <br />all three of the road alternatives. These disturbances would be as foIlows: <br /> <br />. Road Corridor Option 1 would be constructed through the trees approximately <br />100 feet from an open meadow. It would disturb approximately 0.69 acres of land, <br />0.04 acres of which would be wetlands. <br /> <br />. Road Corridor Option 2 would be constructed through the middle of an open <br />meadow. It would disturb approximately 0.89 acres of land, 0.37 acres of which <br />would be wetlands. <br /> <br />:c::~:~~:::l:;:':':::~~~W":'/":~~;tV.<<~~: <br /> <br />:~:l:;'m;::.~~~~~:~:y.-m-;:~::<:=;::;;::.:.ml':<>>.,:,=':::<X-:=:,};~:;':":~.:-0:';':~~:;':(-$:,::;;"'>>;:w.~<::;;,";-.~;:;:x..~ <br /> <br />s-pu",ber 1993 <br /> <br />Page 4.35 <br />