Laserfiche WebLink
<br />/j <br />j <br /> <br />. <br />"""1 <br />j <br /> <br />Maior Physical, Legal, and Institutional Characteristics <br /> <br />;"{; <br />::::-: <br />,j <br /> <br />at some locations and times. Currently, the recognized rights of pueblos in <br />the Middle Rio Grande Valley total 18,579 af of consumptive use, or about <br />6 percent of the Valley's total. (Middle Rio Grande Conservancy District <br />1993). <br /> <br />,",' <br /> <br />.) <br /> <br />Non-Indian Federal Water Rights. The federal government has some <br />rights to water through its role as steward of natural resources, its <br />ownership oflands in the territories prior to and following statehood, and its <br />ownership of rights to water created by the construction of dams and related <br />facilities. Many ofthese rights have not been clearly defined although <br />federal water rights have been or are in the process of being adjudicated. <br />There is some ambiguity, for example, about the federal government's rights <br />to water in the Rio Grande Project. The BuRec holds that all of the water in <br />the Rio Grande from Elephant Butte Dam to Fort Quitman is appropriated <br />for use of the Rio Grande Project and it disposes ofthis water through <br />contracts with the Elephant Butte Irrigation District (EBID), the El Paso <br />County Water Improvement District (EPCWID), and other entities. New <br />Mexico, however, has not fully adjudicated water rights in the Basin and <br />those who put water to a beneficial use prior to 1907 are not required to have <br />a water-use permit. It is possible, therefore, that a court could determine <br />that many of the pre-1907 claims have priority over the BuRec's rights. <br /> <br />:::i <br /> <br />,;., <br /> <br />~.~ <br />"~' <br /> <br />:::: <br /> <br />',,< <br /> <br />.", <br /> <br />Matters are made more complicated because the Texas Natural Resources <br />Conservation Commission has not accepted the BuRec's position that it owns <br />all waters to Ft. Quitman. Instead, it asserts that, once the water passes <br />into Texas, all authority over the water passes to the state (U.S. Depart- <br />ment of the Interior 1995a). <br /> <br />> <br /> <br />U.S.-Mexican Water Treaty of 1906. In the 1880s water shortages near <br />El Paso began to materialize, largely because of extensive irrigation <br />development in Colorado and, to a lesser extent, New Mexico. Mexicans <br />living near Ciudad Juarez complained to their government that the upstream <br />developments were violating their long-established and prior rights to the <br />river's water. The Mexican government subsequently filed a claim for <br />damages with the U.S. government and, in 1906, the two nations signed a <br />treaty, under which the U.S. guarantees to provide Mexico with 60,000 af of <br />water annually at the International Dam at Ciudad Juarez, except during <br />periods of extreme drought. The BuRec subsequently built Elephant Butte <br />Dam, largely to help ensure the nation's ability to meet this obligation. <br /> <br />, <br />:, <br /> <br />j;rnc.i:l <br />, ,......J, <br /> <br />21 <br />