My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
WSP11699
CWCB
>
Water Supply Protection
>
Backfile
>
11000-11999
>
WSP11699
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/26/2010 3:18:34 PM
Creation date
10/12/2006 5:07:22 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Water Supply Protection
File Number
8200.300.40.A
Description
Colorado River Compact
Basin
Colorado Mainstem
Date
11/22/1922
Author
Co. R Compact Comm.
Title
Minutes of Colorado Compact Commission - Meeting #23
Water Supply Pro - Doc Type
Publication
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
38
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />n5 <br /> <br />~ <br /> <br />yield ~o the opinion of the remainder. <br /> <br /> <br />MR. EMERSON: I tbink it is true the upper states,as a whole are not <br /> <br /> <br />please(i with this declaration. We are simply yielding to the point of this, <br /> <br /> <br />in my estimation. . <br /> <br /> <br />lilR. DAVIS. I am unable to see any advantage to :it for the upper. division. <br /> <br /> <br />and lam equally unable to seG. the slifptest advantage. to it for the lower <br /> <br /> <br />division or any part of it. <br /> <br /> <br />IIIR.. illJERSON: From. a practical starldpoint the advantage. goes to the <br /> <br /> <br />lower division. <br /> <br /> <br />MR. HOOVER: It is up to l\lr. LlcCl'JTe to define ,his paragraph. <br /> <br /> <br />!!JR. LIC CLURE: I thinL the. Commissioners undorstand the. situation and <br /> <br /> <br />we need not argue Tiith the Imperial Valley p,eople. <br /> <br /> <br />l'~, DAVIS: I will vote] "Yes'l on the paragraph "iith the statement I <br /> <br /> <br />made, for it will result in a source of extreme embarrassment to Mr. IlcClure, <br /> <br /> <br />instead of extreme assistance, speaking frankly. <br /> <br /> <br />lilR. HOOVER: I would say not. In the negotiation about this paragraph <br /> <br /> <br />it was originally sucgestedfrom the upper states they r:ould be content nith <br /> <br /> <br />sueh Paragraph if the 4 million were limited - or it was suggested by some <br /> <br /> <br />member of the upper. states - and I spoke to the lower states on that subject. <br /> <br /> <br />I don't lmow "rhether you.cnre to pursue it now. <br /> <br /> <br />!elR, Me CLilltE: Doos that have any boaring on that idea. <br /> <br /> <br />MIl, DAVlS~ I think you (addressing Hr. McClure) are unnise in wanting <br /> <br /> <br />that pi'ovision, but I recognizo it is your businoss and not mino, and I <br /> <br /> <br />therefore. vote for it. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />.' <br /> <br />.. <br /> <br />.. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />1ffi. IITC CLURE: Still keepin,gin mind why we p.re ask:Lng for it. <br />Iffi. uAVIS: Yes. If I Viere in your position,. I wouldn't Trant it. <br />lilR. HOOVER: If thore is nothing more on that, ,Te have completed all <br />of. the' articles and are non at the point whore we Yfant te roview the entire <br /> <br />compact~ <br /> <br />. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.