Laserfiche WebLink
<br />172 <br />your protection is contained in the last sentence. <br />JUDGE SLOAN: "OTmers of worles". Ilhy limi,t it to mmers of worlcs? <br />That donlt include appropriators. <br />MIL DAVIS: VIe should adopt tho word "apprppriators". <br />MR. HOOVER: VIe have evorywhore.1Te could. <br />MR. NORVIEJ,: Our folies I donlt thinle would lilee it that way. <br />JUDGE SLOAN: Any existing rights you mean - you Trant it to apply to <br />individuals and companies, donlt you? <br />MR. HOOVBR.: Wl1at they want to limit it to, and I think properly, is <br />to actual beneficial use nO~1 going on so as to get rid of all tho paper <br />stuff. <br />1m. CARPillqTER: This clause has to includeeverythll1g~ <br />1m. MC KISICK: You will accomplish it better by saying in line 4 <br />.from the bottom of that p<tragraph, malee it read "which the usero of .vmtor <br />in the lower basin may now have against the users of water in tlw upper <br />basin". <br />11m, NORVIEL: Isn It that in cenflict with the first period? "present <br />valid and perfected rights to the beneficial uoe of the waters. of the <br />Colorado River System shall c?nstitute the firot charge upon t~e waterp <br />hereby apportion to the division of the basin ;in which they ar9 si.tuated." <br />1m. HOOVERt No conf:).ict there, except th~o is an extension of right. <br />1m. NORVIEL: In either basin. <br />1m. HOOVER: They have that in lavl anyway. We are not adding any- <br />thing to anybodyls rights here, I assume. <br />},ffi. NORVIEL: And we shouldn't taleo any away. <br />JUDGE SLOAN: I think it is possible to do that ~o the extent of <br />requiring users of water to loole to an available source ether than what <br />they might otherwise bl" provided to enjoy, if that source be sufficient <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />" <br /> <br />.. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />. <br />