My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
WSP11699
CWCB
>
Water Supply Protection
>
Backfile
>
11000-11999
>
WSP11699
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/26/2010 3:18:34 PM
Creation date
10/12/2006 5:07:22 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Water Supply Protection
File Number
8200.300.40.A
Description
Colorado River Compact
Basin
Colorado Mainstem
Date
11/22/1922
Author
Co. R Compact Comm.
Title
Minutes of Colorado Compact Commission - Meeting #23
Water Supply Pro - Doc Type
Publication
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
38
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />188 <br /> <br />I,IR. EMERSON: I would like to inquire if it has been definitely <br /> <br />decided that the minimum flew should be changed. <br />1iIR. CARPENTER: I move we strike out tho Imperial Valley clause, <br /> <br />1m. HOOVER: There was an l.lllderstandinc that if the Imporial Valley <br /> <br />was put in that that vlould be Gut out. <br /> <br />Int. DAERSON: Wyoming is the only ene that seems to insist ,on koeping <br /> <br />it in. <br /> <br />I wonder if there is any ohanoe of Ari~ena changing its 'mind. <br />1 : <br /> <br />,. <br />MR. HOOVER: I think it is about pyschology, I don't believo physi- <br />I <br />\ <br />cally you get a drop more water by loaving it in. <br />.1 <br />1iIR. EMERSON: I think Arizona ought to cons:Lder this again this <br /> <br />ovening and see if they cannot consent to the provision of the annual <br /> <br />minimum flow. <br /> <br />, <br />11R. CARPENTill,: Arizona's approhonsion is expressed in paragraph (e). <br /> <br />.. . <br />. - , <br />.\ j," ",' .'. " <br />Thilt was, we might viillfully vlithhold vrater abevo and theroby l.lllreasonably <br /> <br />damage the country belew. That's all from lew flow 0 I thini, paraG1'aph <br /> <br />(e) was put in with idea of cerrocting the pessibility of that and thoreby <br /> <br /> <br />avoids tho necessity of minimum flow as stated. <br /> <br />MR. NORVIEL: What do you moan by would not unreasonably damago tho <br /> <br />lOVlOr Basin'? <br /> <br />MR. CARPENTER: There VJould always be somo damago by reason of drought, - <br /> <br />not only injury imposed by nature, but injury imposod by man, <br /> <br />11R. MC CLURE: I don't see ynlY you object to that, <br /> <br />MR. CARPEN'rER: That was the objectien raised at the time tpe mini- <br /> <br /> <br />mum flow was considered. In paragraPh(e~ you, have cured the objection. <br /> <br />. ' <br />ME. HOOVER: Paragraph (e) givos all tho protection for the ills in <br />paragraph (d). You are'physically not going to get more YIater than they <br /> <br />have got. You aro curtailing ~evelopment within 75,000,000 acre feeto <br /> <br />. . : <br />1m. CARPEtITER: It will reach 4,000,000j a year as far as we are <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.