Laserfiche WebLink
<br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />0553 <br /> <br />SCOPE OF THE ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT <br /> <br />The problems and opportunities of the watershed are directly related to <br />the capabilities and the degree of management of the watershed's <br />resources. The inventory and analysis phases for this plan used a <br />scoping process to identify those economic, environmental, and social <br />areas of primary concern. This was a public participation process, <br />that led to further investigation and analysis by NRCS. <br /> <br />NRCS gathered detailed information on current resource conditions. A <br />projection of future conditions was made in order to formulate and <br />compare alternatives and estimate their impacts. <br /> <br />During the initial stages of planning an analysis of a broad range of <br />economic, environmental, and social factors in the watershed was <br />carried out. Those factors that were directly related to the problems <br />and opportunities and/or those that might be significantly affected by <br />any potential project were considered. Also, each of the problems and <br />concerns identified by the public at the scoping meeting, as well as <br />those requiring consideration in any federally funded project, were <br />reviewed and their significance to decision making was determined. <br /> <br />Table C lists the factors considered in this scoping process and their <br />percei"p.d significance to project formulation and decision-making. <br />Factor rating "Low" or "None" in Table C were not likely to be <br />affected by the project and were considered insignificant to decision <br />making. Therefore, these factors are not discussed in this document. <br />Those factors that have a "High" or "Medium" impact on the watershed <br />would be affected by the project and were significant in decision <br />making. A detailed study was then made on these factors by assessing <br />the current conditions, formulating and comparing alternatives, and <br />determining impacts of a selected plan. <br /> <br />The following issues were raised by the public during initial planning <br />meetings. These issues necessitated NRCS to perform more detailed <br />investigationa as planning progressed. <br /> <br />IWM/Water Conservation <br /> <br />The watershed has an inefficient irrigation water delivery system as <br />well as poor on farm water application. Poor water application <br />increases the deep percolation and runoff which carries the heavy <br />metals, nutrients, salts and sediment to the drains and creeks and <br />finally back to the Arkansas River. The groundwater quality is also <br />deteriorated. <br /> <br />Water Oualitv/Surface and Groundwater <br /> <br />The poor irrigation water application reduces surface and groundwater <br />quality. <br /> <br />20 <br />