Laserfiche WebLink
<br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />05~1 <br /> <br />affected by deep percolation of irrigation waters and were ~arkedly <br />higher than the mean. The current proposed EPA drinking water <br />regulation for uranium is 20 micro grams/liter. This 19.4 ~icro <br />grams/liter concentration is 2-4 times as high as other qua=rangles <br />tested in wester~ U.S. Future levels are anticipated to cc~tinue to be <br />high if irrigation practices remain the same. <br /> <br />Uranium concentrations in the drains and creeks flowing int~ the <br />Arkansas River from the watershed area have readings at times from 20- <br />50 micro grams/liter. The extensive irrigation in this rea=h of the <br />Arkansas River significantly elevates the dissolved concentrations of <br />uranium. This combination of natural and man made effects could <br />compromise the water quality for domestic use {farms, commu~ities,} and <br />agricultural use (irrigation, livestock) that derive water :rom the <br />alluvial aquifer as well as the high concentrations in the river <br />itself. Excessive levels may also be dangerous to wildlife including <br />endangered species. Downstream water quality is also decreased to <br />irrigators who reuse the Arkansas River water. <br /> <br />There are a number of shallow wells in the area that are also high in <br />nitrates. EPA Storet Data indicates there are six wells in the <br />watershed found to exceed the EPA standards (10 mg/lppm) N03-N. The <br />Arkansas Rivers' water approaches the nitrate level standar= at times. <br />The sources of t~e nitrates are a combination of naturally occurring <br />and applied. The top two feet of soil were generally found to have <br />very high concentrations of nitrates. The higher nitrate well <br />concentrations generally occur in the lower portions of the watershed. <br />There are about 25 wells that were found to have nitrate levels <br />approaching or exceeding standards in the watershed area. <br /> <br />Salinity <br />Valley. <br />pick up, <br /> <br />is anot~er serious water quality problem in the Arkansas <br />There are 3 important factors in the salinity problem: salt <br />concentration, and the management of water, soils, and crops. <br /> <br />Although it is desirable to control salt loading, high salt levels will <br />remain as long as the water is used. Therefore, the greatest potential <br />for reducing salinity is through more effectively using water <br />throughout the valley. Irrigation water diverted into the Fort Lyon <br />Canal, upstream 53 channel miles from the project, has a mean TDS of <br />807 milligrams/liter (obtained from USGS records). The mean TDS in the <br />Arkansas River at Las Animas which is just above the project area is <br />1041 milligrams/liter. Just downstream from the project at the Lamar <br />gaging station the mean total dissolved solids (TDS) is 1694 <br />milligrams/liter for the Arkansas River. The TDS levels are therefore <br />increasing downstream due to concentrations of salt in the remaining <br />water. No TDS standards have been set for Colorado, however, TDS <br />levels of 500 is deemed desirable and below 1000 is acceptable for <br />agricultural purposes. It is anticipated that total TDS will be <br />lowered through project action. <br /> <br />Eight organochlorine pesticides were detected in some samples of bird <br />livers and eggs and in fish from the reservoirs. All concentrations <br />were well within the ranges of reported backgroun~/concentrations <br />and were less than levels of biological concern. <br /> <br />15 <br />