My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
WSP11654
CWCB
>
Water Supply Protection
>
Backfile
>
11000-11999
>
WSP11654
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/26/2010 3:18:25 PM
Creation date
10/12/2006 5:05:45 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Water Supply Protection
File Number
8240.200.10.B
Description
UCRBRIP Annual Report
Basin
Colorado Mainstem
Date
12/10/1993
Author
USDOI/FWS
Title
Fiscal Year 1993 Annual Report Part 1
Water Supply Pro - Doc Type
Publication
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
119
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />scour) deep and shallow riffles (gravel, cobble and boulder) ; <br />glides and rapids, Habitat units were visually identified and <br />estimated, and later characterized based on depth and velocity <br />measurements, Class I pools were defined as those over 2 <br />meters deep with a velocity of less than 0,6 ft/sec and Class <br />II pools were over 1 meter deep, These pools are consider <br />good fall/winter habitat for adult squawfish and comparisons <br />will be made between here and the Yampa River to estimate pool <br />availability, Initial findings indicate that pools, compared <br />to other habitats, are rare. Only 76 pools were found in 43 <br />miles of river, comprising only 1.4 %- of the surface 'area. <br />Glides is the unit used to describe the habitat <br />intermediate between pools and riffles. Glides were typically <br />3 to 12 feet deep and had a velocity range of 1 to 3 feet/see, <br />Glides were the most common habitat type (59,6 %-) in this <br />section of the Colorado River. Cobble riffles (low gradient) <br />riffles comprised 34.6%- with boulder riffles (high <br />gradientland rapids comprising 4.0 and O,S%-, r~spectively. <br />Complex channels, formed by islands or bars, were also <br />enumerated during the fall habitat surveys, .. In November about <br />60%- of the river between Rifle and plateau Creek flowed in a <br />single main channel. Therefore about 40%- of the river in <br />this reach contained instream islands or bars. It did not <br />appear that habitat diversity was increased in sections of the <br />river that had just two branches, In general habitat <br />diversity appeared higher in areas with complex channels of <br />three or more river branches, and these were found to comprise <br />11.5%- of the river, <br />The. channel was characterized into three categories based <br />on its ability to overflow its banks, The ability to flood, <br />or to' cut and erode banks is presumed to have been a common <br />natural occurrence that resulted in the habitat diversity in <br />which native fish evolved. It is further assumed that it is <br />very undesirable for banks to become stabilized to the point <br />that the channel can no longer naturally migrate, because <br />losses of nursery habitat for native species appears <br />associated with the river losing access to the floodplain, <br />Fifty-seven percent of this river reach was considered <br />confined (channelized) by high banks or rip-rap, About 29%- <br />of the river would inundate vegetated perimeter areas on bars, <br />islands or the shoreline, but would not inundate out of <br />channel areas. Areas that appeared to have potential for <br />flooding bottomlands were nearly always associated with side <br />channels, and this was about 14%- of areas adjacent to the <br />river . <br />To further assist in the evaluation of channel condition, <br />observations of natural features (side channels, backwaters, <br />bars, beaver dams, cottonwood groves, LOD or fallen trees, and <br />eroding banks) and unnatural features (jetties, revetments, <br />dikes, diversion dams, gravel pits, salt cedar, Russian <br />olives, bank rip rap from railroad or highway) were made. For <br />example, salt cedar and Russian olive are common throughout <br /> <br />5 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.