Laserfiche WebLink
<br />5. Recommendations <br /> <br />a. Implement interim flows (i.e., FWS flow recommendations) <br />that reestablish seasonality. <br /> <br />b. Provide common understanding of water availability. <br /> <br />c. Improve the standardized monitoring program: add a <br />community ecology perspective. <br /> <br />d. Diversify the research program to resolve critical <br />uncertainties. <br /> <br />e. Implement a peer review process. <br /> <br />f. Impl ement adapt i ve management. <br /> <br /> <br />X. Status of Data Submission (Where applicable): NfA <br /> <br />XI. FY, 93 Budget <br /> <br />A. Funds Provided: <br />B. Funds Expended: <br />C. Difference: <br />D. Explanation for <br />expended: NfA <br /> <br />$120,821 <br />$120,821 <br />$ 0 <br />any major discrepancy <br /> <br />between funds provided and <br /> <br />XII. <br /> <br />Recommendations: <br /> <br />Xl'll.. <br /> <br />The Instream Flow Subcommittee and the Biology Committee have <br />approved the six major recommendations made in the final report. <br />Although all recommendations should be implemented, the peer review <br />process should be initiated as soon as possible. <br />"oj <br />Signed:.' " M~ C (7JJ---- <br />L}rinciPa. nvestlgator <br /> <br />J'l. //0/93 <br />Date' <br /> <br />APPENDIX <br /> <br />A. More comprehensive/final project reports: <br /> <br />Stanford, J.A. 1993. Instream flows to assist the recovery of <br />endangered fishes of the upper Colorado River basin: Review <br />and synthesis of ecological information, issues, methods, and. <br />rationale. U.S. Fish Wildl. Serv., Denver, Colorado. 89 pp. + app. <br />