Laserfiche WebLink
<br />b, Review/comment on studies and program administration documents prepared <br />by the Recovery Program participants and others, <br />c. Coordinate with the Colorado Division of Wildlife, Colorado Attorney <br />General's Office, U.S, Fish & Wildlife Service, U.S. Bureau of Reclamation, as <br />well as water and environmental interests, <br />d. Review research proposals, review and assist in annual Recovery <br />Implementation Program budget preparation. <br />e. Prepare and present endangered fish issues at Board meetings. <br />f, Participate in development and implementation of the RIPRAP. <br /> <br />IX. Accomplishments/Initial Findings and Shortcomings: <br /> <br />Accomolishments <br /> <br />o <br />~. <br /> <br />Attended, participated in and prepared for: <br /> <br />o Management Committee meetings <br />o Biology Committee meetings <br />o Water Acquisition Committee meetings <br />o Instream Flow Subcommittee meetings <br />o Guru I and Guru II meetings <br /> <br />b. Attended several informal other planning/scoping meetings; scheduled <br />meetings; reviewed/commented on reports, minutes, handouts, and other <br />technical data, <br /> <br />c. Reviewed and ranked FY 94 research proposals; prepared FY 94 Proposals and <br />FY 92 annual report; provided status updates of various projects at meetings. <br /> <br />d, Prepared Board memos and presented Endangered Fish issues at Board <br />meetings including IS-Mile Reach, Ruedi Reservoir issues, flow <br />recommendation methodologies and augmentation issues, <br /> <br />e, Completed Hatchery Feasibility Study, <br /> <br />Shortcomings <br /> <br />There were no shortcomings, however the GURU II and related modifiable flow <br />issue were more time consuming than originally budgeted for. <br /> <br />X. Status of Data Submission: N/A <br /> <br />2 <br />