Laserfiche WebLink
<br />--:~ <br /> <br />( ': <br />~ <br /> <br />Subsequent to June 16, virtually all inftows have been stored and, as of mid-September, <br />reservoir storage stands at approximately 360 acre-feet. Inflows essentially stopped in early <br />August and reservoir evaporation and seepage is producing a net losing situation. At the end <br />of August storage stood at approximately 450 acre-feet, for a loss of about 90 acre-feet over a <br />two week period, The water in storage is being saved to make a fall stock pond run, As <br />explained for the Gurley system, the stock pond run is used to fill ponds which provide water to <br />livestock over the winter, Existing supplies are considered by ditch company personnel to <br />probably be adequate to make the pond run, <br /> <br />Examination of the inflow records show that approximately 1345 acre-feet of runoff was <br />captured over the April through July period, This represents approximately half of the 2600 <br />acre-feet runoff volume of the inflow predicted for the Cone system by the March and April SCS <br />forecasts, The actual distribution over the season agreed very well with the predicted. As <br />predicted, approximately 50 percent of the season's total runoff had occurred by the end of <br />May, <br /> <br />Examination of the outflow records show that approximately 1430 acre-feet flowed out of the <br />reservoir, Of this amount, approximately 1250 acre-feet were for irrigation releases; the <br />remainder of the measured flows were from leakage lost through the outlet or seepage inflows <br />to the ditch, The increment of additional volume released above that captured over the April <br />through July period represents carry-over storage occurring from winter inflows, <br /> <br />System OperatIons Model Assessment <br /> <br />The development and underlying assumptions of the systems operation model were described <br />in the San Miguel Project Water Supply Study, Summary Report, Demand-Based System <br />Operations (June 1990). Key among the assumptions incorporated in the model to represent <br />the proposed operating plan were the following: operation of the reservoirs in response to crop <br />demands; headgate control on the Cone system; and implementation of an accounting system <br />which would track inflows. outflows, and storage on an individual account basis for both <br />systems to allow greater irrigator flexibility. <br /> <br />The system operations model, therefore, is a predictive tool representative of the proposed <br />operating plan. Because the operating plan was not implemented, an assessment of the model <br />in terms of a detailed comparison between actual and projected operations is of limited utility, <br />Never-the-Iess, a general comparison in broad terms is provided below to illustrate the utility of <br />the program in spite of the differences in detail between actual and proposed operations. <br /> <br />As presented in the San Miguel Project Water Supply Study, Summary Report. Demand-Based <br />System Operations (June 1990), on the basis of March forecasts, it was projected that if <br />attempts to irrigate all of the land were made, available supplies would likely be exhausted by <br />the end of June. If supplies were to be extended further into the season, only between 20 and <br />30 percent of the land should be irrigated. Even at the reduced level of Irrigation, available <br />supplies were projected to be exhausted by August. <br />