My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
WSP11633
CWCB
>
Water Supply Protection
>
Backfile
>
11000-11999
>
WSP11633
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/26/2010 3:18:15 PM
Creation date
10/12/2006 5:05:04 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Water Supply Protection
File Number
8220.101.09
Description
Glen Canyon Dam/Lake Powell
State
AZ
Basin
Colorado Mainstem
Date
3/1/1994
Title
Comments regarding the Draft Biological Opinion on Operations of Glen Canyon Dam
Water Supply Pro - Doc Type
Biological Opinion
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
59
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />. <br />~. <br />8 <br />~ <br />~ <br /> <br />GRAND CANYON NATIVE FISH MANAGEMENT <br /> <br />7 <br /> <br />;iri <br />" <br /> <br />requisite mainstem temperatures couId be reached in earIy June, a time when tributary <br />reproduction by native fishes typically is waning. Therefore, provision:: of a potentiaIIy <br />important environmental cue for reproduction couId be facilitated by flows that are <br />descending at a rate approximating the pre-dam pattern during June and July. High flows <br />. . . couId be maintained for a shorter period, because of the decreased emphasis on retaining <br />young fishes in tributaries, and flow reductions couId occur more rapidly to open rearing <br />habitats following the reproductive period. <br /> <br />>< <br /> <br />;: <br /> <br />.,f <br /> <br />;-~: <br /> <br />Existing knowIedge of nearshore mainstem rearing habitats, particularly backwaters, relative <br />to river stage in Grand Canyon suggests that the number of these habitats presently is <br />inaximized in the range of 5,000-10,000 cfs. Thus, we recommend that dam discharges be <br />Iowered at a more rapid rate beginning in earIy July to reach this range. Decreasing <br />mainstem flows admittedly will dewater rearing habitats at higher stages and form those at <br />Iower stages, resuIting in some displacement of young fishes. In reality, there will be <br />variation in the pattern of summer flows brought about by unpredictabIe tributary floods <br />from monsoonal storms. This condition was common in the evolutionary history of these <br />fishes, however, and we believe the negative effects of such displacements will be diminished <br />considerably in warmer mainchannel waters. In addition, a relatively steep descent to base <br />flows following the peak hydrograph may serve as an important spawning cue. <br /> <br />i:;" <br /> <br />.'~. <br /> <br />'.\ <br /> <br />,;~ <br />?: <br />r~: <br />~-' <br />~~.;: <br />.' <br /> <br />-> <br />;~, .' <br /> <br />,-:.~ <br /> <br />Increased growth rates of young native fishes during the extended period of warm water <br />from June-October will place these individuals at a larger size more able to cope With the <br />return. of cold waters in November. As juvenile big-river fishes reach total lengths 100-150 <br />mm, they begin to occupy deeper waters in eddies Iess affected by diel flow fluctuations. <br />. This change in habitat use provides an opportunity to use hydrology during winter months <br />'.. . ., . . . <br />to further disadvantage non-native fishes, should this action be necessary.:We:believe that. <br />. diel. winter flow fluctuations, of an order similar to those presently in place, couId be used <br />. to destabilize nearshore habitats used by some non-native fishes during this period. Such <br />fluctuations could be used to particular advantage as a tool against smalI-bodied non-natives, <br />. such as fathead minnow and red shiner, that largeIy depend upon nearshore habitats during <br />. their entire life cycle. We understand that these fluctuations wouId also bean advantage to <br />hydroelectric production. <br /> <br /> <br />'~:.\ <br /> <br />.\~ <br /> <br />!t.~:j <br />i~t~ <br /> <br />:?~ <br />~'#: <br />~. <br />,"'; <br />~! <br />i:( <br />~ <br />."ll! <br />;~~~ <br /> <br />Sediment Augmentation Element-The final ingredient to best simulate historic <br />environmental patterns for the betterment of native fish populations wouId be to implement <br />sediment augmentation. The best time for this application wouId be during the highest flows <br />in spring when sediment would be most easily mobilized and distributed to the higher Ievels <br />.of nearshore habitats Within the system. Augmentation would restore the functional roIe that <br />sediment historically fulfilled in the temporal and structural formation of instreaIn habitats, <br />. and would help assure that a sediment b~ce wouId be maintained in Grand Canyon. The <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.