My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
WSP11602
CWCB
>
Water Supply Protection
>
Backfile
>
11000-11999
>
WSP11602
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/26/2010 3:18:09 PM
Creation date
10/12/2006 5:04:26 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Water Supply Protection
File Number
8240.200.30.B
Description
UCRBRIP Instream Flow Approprations
State
CO
Basin
Colorado Mainstem
Date
9/1/1995
Author
CWCB
Title
CWCB Board Meeting Memos
Water Supply Pro - Doc Type
Board Memo
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
80
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />MEMORANOUM <br /> <br />TO: <br /> <br />Gene Jencsok <br /> <br />FROM: <br /> <br />Robert Wigington and Jim Martin <br /> <br />DATED: <br /> <br />October 30, 1995 <br /> <br />SUBJEcr: Criteria for Modification of Paragraph 4 instream flow rights for <br />endangered fish species <br /> <br />~UBSTANTIVE CIUTEIUA <br /> <br />We helieve thallwo bfllad criteria should guide the excn:isc of the Doard's discretion in <br />determining whether a paragraph 4 water right should be mUllilled. In l:valuating both <br />,;rileria, the Board should request and use the best technical and !;Cielltili... infurmatiun that <br />is available atlhar rime. <br /> <br />. Firsl, the Buanl should consider whether, and tu what eiltent a failure 10 modify a <br />paragrapll 4 right Wl.luId matl:riaIly impede the sl<lte of Colorado's ability 10 develop <br />the water to which the slale is cnlitlc:d under the L:1w ur the River. J\s part uf this <br />analysis, the Board shuuld consider, among other things, the swtus (If water resuurce <br />--- ~- -dl:velopmenlthruught1ul the Colorado River basin within lhe state of Colorado, the <br />status ur water resource dcvelopml:nl within individual basins and suh.ha.suts. amI the <br />Stale Engineer's views cuncerning the amount uf water available for develllpment <br />within the terms of the Law uf Ihe River and the imm inencc of the nCl:d for <br />administration pursuant 10 the Upper Basin Compact and any regulations the State <br />Engineer may havc adopted to adminisll:r a call under that U:lmpact. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />Second, the Board should ct)ositler how modification of a paragraph 4 water right will <br />affect consetvatilln and recovery of fish species that have heen lis led as threatened lIr <br />endangered under the Endangered Spedcs Acl. As parI of thi~ analysis, the B,)ard <br />should consider, amllng other things, the basin. suh-basin and reach thal would be <br />affected; Ihe seaS<.ln during which the modifi\:llliun's depletions wuuld occur, amI the <br />depletions' effect un liming, shape, duralion, and magnilude of nllWS within critical <br />habita~ h,lw those depletions will affccl hOlh the 13(lurd's instream !low right and lhe <br />U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service '.s insln;am tlow recommendations fur the aiTecled <br />reach, the species and life IDslOry of the endangered fish thill would be affected by a <br />modificalion. the population status of those species, and the errect of lhe modification <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.