My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
WSP11577
CWCB
>
Water Supply Protection
>
Backfile
>
11000-11999
>
WSP11577
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/26/2010 3:18:04 PM
Creation date
10/12/2006 5:03:33 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Water Supply Protection
File Number
8407
Description
Platte River Basin - River Basin General Publications
State
CO
Basin
South Platte
Water Division
1
Date
8/1/1969
Author
Corps of Engineers
Title
Review Report - South Platte River and Tributaries - Colorado Wyoming and Nebraska - Interim Report on Sand and Toll Gate Creeks - Colorado - Report and Appendix I
Water Supply Pro - Doc Type
Report/Study
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
112
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />n" ~,t- ~~ <br />~ J ! , '. ~ ' I <br />~'" '-- - <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />(3) Downstream areas. The solutions considered for <br />reducing the flood problems in the areas along the Cherry Creek <br />channel downstream from the Cherry Creek Dam i",luded zoning, <br />evacuation, flood proofing, channel improvements, levees, and <br />reservoir storage. <br /> <br /> <br />(a) Zoning, evacuation, and flood proofing. Down- <br />stream from the Cherry Creek Dam, flood plain development ranges <br />from undeveloped to fully developed. The undeveloped areas are <br />located near the dam. The flood plain between the dam and the <br />South Platte River contains extensive residential, commercial, <br />and industrial improvements. In addition, flood plain lands con- <br />tain numerous streets and highways essential to the economic <br />environment of the Metropolitan Denver area. Since a major <br />portion of the flood plain is fully developed, zoning would not <br />be an effective solution to the flood problem and the cost of <br />evacuation would be prohibitive. Due to the extensive develop- <br />ment downstream from the Cherry Creek Dam, a large number of <br />structures would have to be modified and flood proofed to reduce <br />flood damages. Flood proofing of existing structures would cost <br />in excess of $50 million. Because the areas subject to future <br />development are relatively small, improvements may be an effective <br />method of reducing future flood damages. <br /> <br />(b) Channel improvement. Studies were made to <br />determine the feasibility of channel improvements between the <br />Cherry Creek Dam and the South Platte River. These studies con- <br />sidered the use of existing channel structures and rights of way <br />in developing potential channel improvement projects. It was <br />found that construction of channel improvements providing protec- <br />tion against a standard project flood would be economically <br />feasible. <br /> <br />(c) Levees. Construction of levees along Cherry <br />Creek downstream from the dam would require the modification and <br />raising of bridges along Cherry Creek. Bridge approaches and <br />adjoining streets would have to be raised. Near the channel, <br />streets would be higher than entrances to buildings, and serious <br />drainage problems would result. Because of these disadvantages, <br />levees would not be an acceptable solution to the flood problem. <br /> <br />(d) Reservoir storage. Goldsmith Gulch is the <br />largest contributor of runoff downstream from the Cherry Creek <br />Dam. Flood plains along Goldsmith.Gulch are extensively developed, <br />and all potential reservoir sites have been preempted. Construc- <br />tion of flood control reservoirs along Goldsmith Gulch would be <br />impractical. <br /> <br />29 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.