My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
WSP11573
CWCB
>
Water Supply Protection
>
Backfile
>
11000-11999
>
WSP11573
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/26/2010 3:18:04 PM
Creation date
10/12/2006 5:03:28 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Water Supply Protection
File Number
8210.766
Description
Gunnison River General Publications - Correspondence - Reports - Etc
State
CO
Basin
Yampa/White
Water Division
6
Date
3/1/1993
Author
Unknown
Title
Scoping Report for the Gunnison River Contract - Analysis Notebook - Section I - Comments by Source
Water Supply Pro - Doc Type
Report/Study
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
94
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />v- - <br /> <br />ncr~'5'~ <br /> <br />., <br /> <br />Public Scoping Comments, Gunnison River Contract, cont. <br /> <br />,~t~l;F;?; <br /> <br />2.1, 01, <br />sale. <br />2.1, 02. <br />Mesa)? <br />2.1, 03, <br />2.1, 04, <br />2,1, 05, <br />2.1, 06, <br />2.1. 07. <br /> <br />8. 2.1. 08, Agreement from before dam regarding 60,000 acre-feet to protect upstream water <br />rights from downstream calls. The issue comes down to timing of releases to provide this protection. <br />What's wrong with delivering to protect upstream folks? (answer "fisb"). <br /> <br />STUDY. <br /> <br />2.1, <br /> <br />:~:j~~~/:~t;~ <br /> <br />9, <br /> <br />2.1. 10. <br />river? <br /> <br />14a. <br /> <br />2,1. 11. <br />frequency). <br /> <br />14a, <br /> <br />2,1. <br /> <br />12, <br /> <br />14c. <br /> <br />2.1. <br /> <br />13. <br /> <br />3b. <br /> <br />2.1. 14. <br />2,1. 16. <br />2,1.15). <br /> <br />13b. <br /> <br />2.1, <br /> <br />15, <br /> <br />09. <br /> <br />Further study effects of timing of releases upon Upper Basin priorities. <br /> <br />Can't Blue Mesa releases be made in June to meet user needs without calling the <br /> <br />.Will June releases impact reservoir -- through increased drawdowD (amount and/or <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />How much "brown" (shoreline along reservoirs) will be seen (reference No.2, I, Il)? <br /> <br />How much will this affect fish (fishing from shoreline)? <br /> <br />Why has National Park Service taken so long to quantifY its rights? <br />How can this process proceed without this information? (reference No.2. 1, 14 & <br /> <br />How will National Park Service quantification affect water users? <br /> <br />13b. 2,1, 18. How does Bureau of Reclamation feel about NECD (Arapahoe County) condemning <br />water rights for their (Rocky Point or Union Park) project(s)? Can they legally do that? Can Bureau <br />of Reclamation override? <br /> <br />19b. 2,1, 18. How does Bureau of Reclamation feel about NECD (Arapahoe County) condemning <br />water rights for their (Rocky Point or Union Park) project(s)? Can they legally do that? Can Bureau <br />of Reclamation override? <br /> <br />5 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.