My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
WSP11573
CWCB
>
Water Supply Protection
>
Backfile
>
11000-11999
>
WSP11573
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/26/2010 3:18:04 PM
Creation date
10/12/2006 5:03:28 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Water Supply Protection
File Number
8210.766
Description
Gunnison River General Publications - Correspondence - Reports - Etc
State
CO
Basin
Yampa/White
Water Division
6
Date
3/1/1993
Author
Unknown
Title
Scoping Report for the Gunnison River Contract - Analysis Notebook - Section I - Comments by Source
Water Supply Pro - Doc Type
Report/Study
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
94
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />., <br /> <br />Mlssn <br /> <br />Public Scoping Comments, GWl1lison River Contract, conI. <br /> <br />t/~;~ J;\ <br />.::. ." <br /> <br />16c. <br /> <br />14c. <br /> <br />I. 15, <br />Mesa). <br /> <br />Impacts of low water levels - i.e. dust blowing, etc. (air quality related from Blue <br /> <br />I. <br /> <br />16, Address impacts of Aspinall operation on trout and fisbing (Gold Medal). <br /> <br />12. I. 17. Look at entire basin; coordinate Aspinall operations to have the least amount of <br />impact (not harm) to eitber the Upper or Lower Gunnison Basin. <br /> <br />9. I. 18. Take into account dry years, upstream calls. Tie needs to forecasted amount of <br />available water eacb year. <br /> <br />13b. L 18. Take into account dry years, upstream calls. Tie needs to forecasted amount of <br />available water eacb year. <br /> <br />12. 1. 19. Don't impact upstream users with additional caUs from National Park Service or <br />Aspinall -- if not covered by 60,000 acre-feet (commitment from Aspinall). <br /> <br />13b. I.' 19, Don't impact upstream users with additional calls from National Park Service or <br />Aspinall -- if not covered by'60,ooo acre-feet (commitment from Aspinall), <br /> <br />14a, <br /> <br />19f. <br /> <br />II. <br /> <br />21. <br /> <br />14a, <br /> <br />16b, <br /> <br />I. 20, Provide data on how Gunnison Basin works with Upper Colorado, Green River, and <br />other basins to meet needs of endangered fish. <br /> <br />.....'.. <br />:);:;:~~:\) <br /> <br />1. 20. Provide data on how Gunnison Basin works with Upper Colorado, Green River, and <br />other basins to meet needs of endangered fish. <br /> <br />'. ;':~ ," <br /> <br />1. <br /> <br />Alternative: purchase/condemn flows going to east slope for endangered fish <br /> <br />21. <br /> <br />preservation. <br /> <br />L <br /> <br />Coordinate this environmental review with current W AP A EIS. <br /> <br />22, <br /> <br />I. <br /> <br />23. <br /> <br />Address impacts on rafting industry as a result of Aspinall operation changes. <br /> <br />\. <br /> <br />Address (impacts on) geomorphology as in No. 23 above. <br /> <br />24. <br /> <br />19c. 1. 25, Address impacts of flows bypassing Redlands diversion on the Grand Junction <br />Riverfront Trail system. <br /> <br />11. <br /> <br />13b. <br /> <br />ISd. <br /> <br />1. <br /> <br />26. <br /> <br />Leave it like it is. <br /> <br />1. <br /> <br />27. <br /> <br />What is impact to Upper Gunnison Basin instream flows? and Lower Basin? <br /> <br />1. <br /> <br />28. <br /> <br />"Address impacts to macroinvertebrate in the Monument and downstream. <br /> <br />16a2. 1. 29. What are alternatives to solve icing other than low reservoir -- i.e. Jand acquisition, <br />Taylor Park Reservoir operation. <br /> <br />".:'--~ ., <br />'-~.;. . '. ~ . '.: <br /> <br />2 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.