Laserfiche WebLink
<br />nD152~ <br /> <br />" <br /> <br />Public Scoping Comment>, Gunnison River Contract, cont. <br /> <br />19. CRWCD; p3,'S. 12. If FWS proposes to use Aspinall Unit water in a fish-passage structure at <br />the Red1ands diversion dam, FWS must provide an assessment of the potential negative impacts of sucb <br />structure on the thriving, but not yet endangered, native-fish populations in the lower Gunnison River. <br /> <br />IS. CRWCD; p3,'9. 13. USBR must quantify the power-revenue and recreational water-level <br />impacts on the Aspinall Unit which are associated with releases for BCNM and endangered fish. <br /> <br />17. CRWCD; p3,'9. 13. USBR must quantify the power-revenue and recreational water-level <br />impacts on the Aspinall Unit which are associated with releases for BCNM and endangered fish. <br /> <br />20b. CRWCD; p4,'1. ' 14. Aspinall Unit cost repayment allocations have been established for 30 <br />years. Changes in' operation to meet BCNM and/or endangered fish needs must not be allowed to shift <br />the burden of cost repayment onto local water users or power customers. NPS and FWS should carry <br />. proportionate share of the cost-repayment obligation. <br /> <br />22. CRWCD; p4,'2. The comments offered here are in addition to those in the February 27,1992, <br />letter addressed to you by ,the "Non-Federal parties to the 1975 Exchange Agreement" (copyatlached). <br />We ask that you incorporate ,the comments of the "Non-Federal Parties" with ours at this stage ,of the <br />scoping process. <br /> <br />46 <br /> <br />:d.Cf:\, <br /> <br />'. <br />. :l~:. . <br /> <br />,<v:.... <br />....<:-:::~:.;.;,; <br />;?<~~.::j <br />