My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
WSP11573
CWCB
>
Water Supply Protection
>
Backfile
>
11000-11999
>
WSP11573
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/26/2010 3:18:04 PM
Creation date
10/12/2006 5:03:28 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Water Supply Protection
File Number
8210.766
Description
Gunnison River General Publications - Correspondence - Reports - Etc
State
CO
Basin
Yampa/White
Water Division
6
Date
3/1/1993
Author
Unknown
Title
Scoping Report for the Gunnison River Contract - Analysis Notebook - Section I - Comments by Source
Water Supply Pro - Doc Type
Report/Study
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
94
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />001595 <br /> <br />., <br /> <br />Public Scoping Comments, Gunnison River Contract, cont. <br /> <br />;~:.~;~!:~~~~l <br /> <br />18e. 3. 31. Economic impact to communities due to effects on recreational use of reservoirs. <br />Avoid boom/bust of loans based On current situation. Many things are related to how mucb water in <br />reservoir. (Reference Johnson - Walsh Report - Economic analysis of Blue Mesa shows its a $2.3 <br />million fishery!) <br /> <br />14a. 3. 32. Concerned about decreased fishing/tour boat access to Morrow Point and Crystal <br />Reservoir with altered flows, <br /> <br />22. 3. 33. How many opportunities for input will we have for studies identified in scoping <br />report. Schedule? <br /> <br />22. <br /> <br />3. <br /> <br />34. <br /> <br />Will additional input be accepted after July IS?, <br /> <br />11. <br /> <br />3. <br /> <br />35. <br /> <br />Consider no action (Do nothing alternative). <br /> <br />6. 3. 36. Experiment may produce no results for endangered fish; stretch of river is smaIl <br />compared to whole system. Has anyone challenged? Who says its even necessary? <br /> <br />14a. 3. 36. Experiment may produce no results for endangered fish; stretch of river is smaIl <br />compared to whole system: Has anyone challenged? Who says its even necessary? <br /> <br />.-..;....;c'. <br /> <br />19f. <br /> <br />3. 36. Experiment may produce no results for endangered fish; stretch of river is smaIl <br />compared to whole system. Has anyone challenged? Who says its even necessary? <br /> <br />.. , <br />, .;:., ...~. ..~ <br /> <br />,. .....:. <br /> <br />6. 3. 37. temperature changes -- reservoir (water) too cold for endangered fish. What is <br />purpose of improving habitat in canyon when they can'tldon'tlive there anyway? Definition of <br />habitatlgoals needed. <br /> <br />14a. 3. 37. Temperature changes -- reservoir (water) too cold for endangered fish. What is <br />purpose of improvUig habilat in canyon when they can'tJdon'tlive there anyway? Definition of <br />habitat/goals needed. <br /> <br />12. <br /> <br />3. <br /> <br />38. <br /> <br />Is no cost too high? When are results not worth cost? (B/C analysis needed) <br /> <br />l5b. 3. 39. Over billions of years, how many species extinct? Study needed to determine impacts <br />on U.S.; common sense needed. <br /> <br />STUDY. <br /> <br />3. '39. Over billions of years, how many species extinct? Study needed to determine <br />impacts on U.S.; common sense needed. <br /> <br />14c. 3. 40. Concerned that Gold Medal fishery might be destroyed to benefit smaIl stretch of <br />habilat for endangered fish. <br /> <br />02. 3. 41. Does this (contract) coincide with intent of Congress? If not, Department of Interior <br />agencies have to override Congress. (Is this consistent with) Act authorizing Aspinall? <br /> <br />17 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.