Laserfiche WebLink
<br />I <br />I <br />1 <br />1 <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />1 <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I' <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />Cost Effective Stream-Gaging Strategies <br />for the Lower Colorado River Basin <br /> <br />INTRODUCTION <br /> <br />The waters of the Colorado River have been scrutinized as a source <br /> <br />of irrigation at least since the time of the Powell Survey (Powell, 1875). <br /> <br /> <br />As the southwestern United States began to develop, the Colorado River was <br /> <br /> <br />also seen as a source of municipal and industrial water supply. Because nine <br /> <br />states, seven from the United States and two from Mexico, share the drainage <br /> <br />basin of the Colorado River, as shown in figure 1, competition for the water <br /> <br />became inevitable. In 1922, the drainage basin was partitioned for <br /> <br />administrative purposes into the Upper Colorado River Basin and the Lower <br /> <br /> <br />Colorado River Basin by an interstate compact (Colorado River Compact, 1922). <br /> <br /> <br />The dividing line is the drainage divide between surface waters that flow <br /> <br /> <br />into the river above Lee Ferry, Arizona, and those that reach the river <br /> <br />below Lee Ferry. This divide is shown in figure 1. In addition to setting <br /> <br />up the designation of Upper and Lower Basins, the compact allocated the <br /> <br />waters of the river between the Upper and Lower Basins and among the various <br /> <br />states represented in the partition. As an aid to the administration of <br /> <br />the compact, certain stream-gaging stations were established by the United <br /> <br />States Geological Survey where the flow of the main river, its tributaries, <br /> <br />and subsequent diversions and return flows were to be measured. <br /> <br />Continued development of the river basin and adjacent areas to which <br /> <br />the river's waters were diverted led to still more competition and resulted <br /> <br /> <br />in a U.S. Supreme Court ruling (Arizona vs. California, 1963) on the <br /> <br /> <br />relative rights of two of the Lower Basin states, California and Arizona. <br /> <br /> <br />This court decision and its attendant implementation led to a major increase <br />