Laserfiche WebLink
<br />to the lower reaches of the streams has brought into view, the fact <br />that future development or subsequent development is large.ly em- <br />barr:lssed by the construction of those enormous reservoirs below, <br />Therefore, we are brought to this propos.l at this time largely out <br />of past experience; and, as I have several times stated, to the position <br />of one about, to construct a largo building and finding it bettor busi- <br />ness to eloar the title to tho llUld before the building is constructed, <br />As time goes on, the probable first development on the Colorado <br />.River will be OIl the lower river or the lower end of the river, because <br />the upper development will be more in detail on segregated tracts and <br />slower, and much of it will depend upon the ingenuity and invcntive- <br />ness of manki lld. To use an Illustration, 20 years ago you could not <br />have built tUllnols as they do now, I have in mind oue tunnel2t miles <br />long, built by private enterprise through a mountain mnge, for the <br />transportation of water for irrigation purposes only, That tunnel <br />was madc pORsible purdy by the invention of the air drill, by means <br />of which thc cost of tunneling was so much reduced that it became <br />possible, but before the invention of the compressed-air drill it was <br />not possihle. There.rol'e., as time goes on new inven.tions win make <br />possiblc the irrigation of hig-h table-lands that can not now be served <br />by wator by modern mechamc!lJ meltns; but those tracts are necessarily <br />segregated, isolated, and small arelts when compared with the larger <br />lower dcvelopment, It is to preserve the Ijght,to development, un- <br />hampcred and without handouffs, in that ~ part that is desired, <br />We feel that their future development should be settled ancl agreed <br />to in advance of construction on the lower river of works vf such <br />magnitude t!U/,t could by any stretch of the imagination be Il1ade to <br />interfere with the upper development. We are brought to that view <br />by 0111' UnfOl'Lllllate experience on the two river:1. I have named. <br />Mr. Rom,s. This Government commission~'wollld not necessarily <br />be vitally interested in the contention between the several St.ates, It <br />would tender suggestions, perha.ps, but I think its work would bo <br />much less tha,u that oJ the commissioners for the States, <br />Mr. CAHPKNTBR. Here. is a. remarkable situa.tion. I ventul'P- to say <br />t.h.t it is a circumstance without p"rallel iu the history of the United <br />Stat.es, where seveIl States with but very little preliminary thought <br />on t111) subject. quietly !lnG unioodly enact legislation le"ding to one <br />common purpose of this kind, In the next place, it is to the great <br />iuterest of th" United Sliltes to preserve the comit,y between the " <br />Sta,te,s to its fullest degr"e; so that the Unite,1 States here not only <br />nets, as you snggest, as a commissioner but as a conciliatory influence <br />where hU1nan :1.gencics might enter into a conference among commis- <br />sioners mn.king some commissioners, possibly, lose sight of their <br />duties,' Tho. inGuenco of the strong mIen would be the able-bodied <br />influence in bringing abouL the desired end-that in, perpetual peace, <br />and quiet upon that river among all of the sev~n States involved., <br />Mr, Y A'I'ES, And also to see to the moldmf: of !ts ~orm so as to brmg <br />it in JlIl,rmony with the Feclel'lll laws ancl ConstItutIOn 1 <br />Mr. CAHPI,j.NTER. Yes, sir. <br />'The C.UAIRMAN. The Federal Government has [l. direct interest in <br />it, in that it hus !nuds that a~e under irrigation or that they intend <br />to irrigate, , ' <br />Mr. CARPEN'l'J':n. There is a. large acrefLge, or a greater acreage, of <br />land yet to be served within the enLire Colorado River drainage, <br />