Laserfiche WebLink
<br />00233n <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />,. <br /> <br />adopt this Procedure, in order to allow staff to begin putting into motion those activities that are <br />required to complete this process in a timely manner. <br /> <br />Colorado River Environmental Activities <br /> <br />Lower Colorado River Multi-Species Conservation Program (MSCP) <br /> <br />The Technical Consulting Team ofSAIC/Jones and Stokes has made significant progress <br />Over the past thirty-day period. SAIC/JSA has released several key draft work products, including: <br />(1) final work plan for MSCP development; (2) proposed habitat classification; (3) revised <br />"covered" species list and selection criteria; (4) proposed criteria for conservation opportunity area <br />suitability; and (5) preliminary candidate conservation opportunity area options. I have included <br />copies of the proposed habitat classification and revised covered species lists for your review and <br />infonnation in the Board folder. <br /> <br />I would like to point out that the SAIC/JSA Team has developed a set of biological and <br />ecological criteria which were used to re-evaluate the need to include the nearly 100 species <br />originally proposed for coverage in the MSCP. The SAIC/JSA Team has recommended that the <br />MSCP participants only seck incidental take authorization for approximately 35-45 species. <br />Generally, these would ensure inclusion of all currently listed species under federal and state laws, <br />all of the California fully protected species (seven) which occupy portions of the planning area, and <br />those species likely to be listed as threatened or endangered during the 50-year implementation <br />period. <br /> <br />The remaining 45-50 species would be addressed in the MSCP environmental documents <br />(EIS/R) and HCP as "species likely to benefit from conservation actions, but are not likely to require <br />incidental take authorizations." The MSCP Biology Subcommittee has reviewed the revised species <br />list and selection criteria and has generally concurred with the process and results. <br /> <br />Mr. Greg Taylor, the MSCP's Pilot Project manager, recently met with interests in Arizona, <br />California, and Nevada regarding the development of the Pilot Project Legislative package. The <br />proposed projects to be included in the package are the following: (I) habitat acquisition along the <br />lower Virgin River in Nevada; (2) habitat restoration on the Colorado River Indian Tribes reservation <br />in Arizona; (3) potential acquisition of the SDG&E/Sempra lands in the Palo Verde Valley; (4) <br />potential acquisition of the Cibola Valley Irrigation & Drainage District in Arizona; and (5) a <br />wetlands restoration project near Yuma, Arizona. Mr. Taylor has had a series of meetings with <br />proponents for each of these projects and is developing packages for inclusion in the proposed <br />legislation. According to agency representatives and legislative liaisons, the proposed package needs <br />to be completed by mid- to late-April 200 I if it is to be seriously considered in this session of <br />Congress. <br /> <br />MSCP Steering Committee Meeting with Us. Fish and Wildlife Service - Arizona Ecological <br />Services Office, Phoenix, March 21,2001 <br /> <br />On November 29, 2000, the MSCP Steering Committee received a letter from the U.S. Fish <br />and Wildlife Service - Arizona Ecological Services Office in Phoenix, Arizona. The letter expressed <br />concern over the proposed schedule for completion of the MSCP by May 2002. The USFWS <br /> <br />5 <br />