Laserfiche WebLink
<br />00237fl <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />l. <br /> <br />coefficients had to be used. <br /> <br />- Reclamation indicated that the type of soil in which plants are growing can affect water <br />usage. Reclamation was asked if it planned to prepare soil classification maps for the entire Lower <br />Basin and use soil classification in the LCRAS methodology to account for soil type. Reclamation <br />seemed hesitate to commit to such a major undertaking. <br /> <br />Also at the meeting, a representative of the U.S. Geological Survey presented methodology <br />that it intends to use to determine the accuracy of its measurements. For the 1999 LCRAS report, <br />the flow below Hoover Dam had to be increased by 2%, (264,618 acre-feet) to create a balanced <br />water budget. <br /> <br />With regard to the actual 1999 LCRAS report, that following issues were discussed: <br /> <br />. Reclamation is planning to install temporary stations in phreatophyte areas to better <br />determine the amount of water used by phreatophytes. These native plant areas <br />consumed, according to the 1999 LCRAS report, 585,923 acre-feet of water in 1999. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />The original meeting agenda indicated that attendees would discuss the manner in <br />which LCRAS intends to determine phreatophyte conswnptive use. This is a major <br />factor in the LCRAS procedure, and potential clarification of the methodology was <br />discussed briefly in my report to the Board last month. Resolution of this issue may <br />greatly affect the determination of Article V consumptive use. This item had been <br />removed from the meeting's agenda however, and was therefore not discussed. <br /> <br />J <br /> <br />. The 1999 LCRAS report reduced the flow at the Northerly International Boundary <br />by 92,026 acre-feet to create a balance in the water budget. California's <br />representatives, who asked most of the questions during the meeting, stated that, <br />historically, in many years, such a reduction would have resulted in an apparent <br />failure to meet the Mexican water treaty obligation. What would Reclamation do <br />when this happened in the future? Reclamation responded that such a situation <br />would be dealt with when it occurred. <br /> <br />California's Colorado River Water Use Plan <br /> <br />On March 5'", I attended a meeting in Sacramento, hosted by Mike Spear, Western Regional <br />Director of the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service to discuss the IID/SDCW A Water Transfer and the <br />associated ESA compliance. At the meeting, lID explained its time line for completing the <br />environmental compliance associated the IID/SDCWA' water conservation and transfer program. <br />During the meeting, all of the California parties explained the importance of this program and the <br />need to keep it on schedule. <br /> <br />Basin States/Ten Tribes Discussion <br /> <br />Seven Basin Slales' Tour oflhe Colorado River Delta. Mexico <br /> <br />Last month I informed the Board that the Southern Nevada Water Authority had arranged a <br /> <br />3 <br />