Laserfiche WebLink
<br />, <br /> <br />o <br />, --J <br /> <br />-~---- <br /> <br />1.- N_____----- <br />---CJ1 <br />V\ <br />c..;1 <br /> <br />------ <br /> <br />June 7, 194:\ <br /> <br />Mr. Geo. S. Knapp, Chief <br />Divieion of Water Reeourcee <br />New England Building <br />Topeka, Kanlla8 <br /> <br />ReI Adminietration <br />Arkll.Deu Rivor <br /> <br />Dear 1Ir. Knapp I <br /> <br />This will acknowledge receipt of youre of June 5th, transmitting <br />your tabulations for >>ayl <br /> <br />(l) Deliveriee of water at State line <br />(2) Diversions by ColorBdo ditches below Caddoa Reservoir <br />(S) Additional or excees diversions by ditches above Caddoa Reservoir <br />(4) 710'1' into Caddoa Eeeer?oir from the Arkans8e and Purgatoire <br /> <br />Rivera. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />Theae tabulationa evidently passed my tabulatione pnd exp1anatione <br />there6f oovering itelll8 1, 2 8JJd l! above, eent you on June 2nd. <br /> <br />I have checked the above itelllS l, 2 and 3, with my daily COlllputa- <br />tione with the follOWing general resultl <br /> <br />My computatione or 1t8lll 1 were compiled from ~ater Commissioner <br />IlcGrath's Dally reporta, which shew deliveries at the State line of l440 acre <br />feet lese than your compilations. <br /> <br />My compilations, hO'l'evar, included merely estimatee for May 30 and <br />Sl, eince I did not have ~. ~cGrsth'a reporte for those days. The d1~~erence <br />between our cOlllputations, h01l8't.,r, are probably largely due t.o channel c~ges <br />at the State line stBtions. <br /> <br />.ls to it_ 2, my f1guree of daily divers10ne by all the Colorado <br />canale below Caddoa, with a few elight exceptions, check with your tabulations, <br /> <br />'or the period lay 19 to 22 inclusive, it is noted that you have <br />charged to the Lamar Canal the totel a.aount of its divereionll, 17 e.f. of <br />which, he..-EWer, eacb dey" Ihould be charged to the l.lanval ditch. This .item <br />of 17 s.f. wae del1veredout of the .Amity to tha Mamel from May 19 tc) 31, <br />with the axception of the 27th. ' <br /> <br />.-- <br /> <br />I did not charge th.e Amity and Hyde ditches with any drainaga\water <br />t;,ey may have intercepted, altho such it8llls are Si:OWIl in ~~e_A.V .D. daily r..-"" <br />portB~for t..~ll" reallon that they -are mere -ust1l11etelS, "aDd in the adminietrat.ion <br />-of our streams, DO account is taken of intqrcepted see~age by ditches,:since <br />this would involve an 1m.posaible taek. <br /> <br />\ <br />, <br />, <br />