Laserfiche WebLink
<br />13. The sources of water quality problems related to hioh concentrations <br /> <br />of chromium, cyanide, and selenium are unknown. <br /> <br />14. Proposed stream use classifications are shown in Table 2. Comparison <br /> <br />of water quality problems and potential use classifications is also indicated <br /> <br />in Table 2. Subbasin boundaries are delineated on Figure 1. <br /> <br />land Use/Population <br /> <br />l. The vagaries of energy development in the ~est make the use of anY <br /> <br />population projections suspect. <br /> <br />2. land use planning is being accomplished without complete benefit of <br /> <br />assessing the impacts on water, air, and land. resources. <br /> <br />3. It is better to assume a reasonable development projection and <br /> <br />continue planning activities with careful monitoring of realized growth than <br /> <br />it is to respond to development after the fact vlith hasty olanninn of services. <br /> <br />4. The level of available land use plans varies considerably throughout <br /> <br />the Study Area. Moffat and Rio Blanco Counties and Carbondale have current <br /> <br />comprehensive land use plans. Carfie1d and ~2sa Counties need to revise land <br /> <br />use plans. <br /> <br />5. No comprehensiye land use plans exist for larqe tracts of nub1ic <br /> <br />lands in the Study Area. <br /> <br />6. There is no overall management of growth and development in the Study <br /> <br />Area. <br /> <br />Point Source Controls <br /> <br />1. ~'1odellinq efforts in the Roarinq Fork River Su:;basin have Droduced <br /> <br />conflicting, incomplete data for rlannin0 purposes. <br /> <br />2. A mass balance formulation for determining re~uired treat~ent levels <br /> <br />afforus a practical, efficient apfJroach to roint source Dla.nnin~. <br /> <br />- 7 - <br /> <br />(;r.?i:JnQ <br />\".; u"VV\,I' <br />