My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
WSP11451
CWCB
>
Water Supply Protection
>
Backfile
>
11000-11999
>
WSP11451
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/26/2010 3:17:30 PM
Creation date
10/12/2006 4:59:23 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Water Supply Protection
File Number
8443.200
Description
Narrows Unit - Mailing Lists and Correspondence
State
CO
Basin
South Platte
Water Division
1
Date
9/14/1951
Title
General News Articles and Press Releases related to the Narrows Unit
Water Supply Pro - Doc Type
News Article/Press Release
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
25
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />~., <br /> <br />2832 <br /> <br />, <br /> <br />ing in Sterling. would not venture <br />to make an estimate as to the cost \ <br />of such water. In the brief publish.' <br />Ilred by the Colorado Water Conser- ~ <br />vation .Board, J. H. Knights <br />(bureau official) states as follows: <br />"Water service contracts between <br />I the United States and the individual <br />! water user or companies should <br />be negotiated on an annual ba'sis, <br />! the price at which the water should <br />I be sold each :year to be based un <br />: the anticipated supply and demand <br />and other related economic [ac. <br />tors for that year." <br />The bureau has not made known <br />any contracts with :my irrigation <br />system. Which ones will be favor- <br />,ed with an increased supply of <br />: water? Will these systems receive <br />wa ter in order of existing priori- <br />~ies ? <br /> <br />Damage Completed <br />The Narrows darn leaves the <br />Bijou and Kiowa streams to ram- <br />I page unchecked. At flood Ume the <br />I Bijou and Kiowa complete their <br />damage before they reach the Nar- . <br />rows. <br />These streams head 90 miles <br />I south at an elevation of over 3,000 <br />I feet. There is a drop of 4,000 feet. <br />on these steep watersheds. Their i <br />floods can be curbed only by up. \ <br />: stream dams. Upstream dams I <br />: would also replenis~ the under- <br />: ground watcrflow at Wiggins. <br />In view of the above statements <br />'and facts <br />, <br /> <br />Resolved that: <br />I 1. Any adjudication of irrigation i <br />I water from the South Platte river I <br />I granted by the state- of Colorad€l <br />must be a definite and defined <br />irrigation system currently in op. <br />eration. <br />. 2. Water impounded in any chan. <br />nel dam must be applied to land <br />already included or under an ex- <br />isting irrigation system only. Colo. <br />rado-Big Thompson Diversion wa- <br />ter cannot be used on new land in <br />accordance with the Enabling Act <br />of the Colorado-Big Thompson pro- <br />ject. <br />Must Be Exploited <br />3. Any channel dam constructed <br />I across the South Platte river shall <br />be under the control of the water. <br />users receiving irrigation water <br />from such project and officials of <br />same must be elected annually. <br />4. All off-channel storage must I <br />be exploited before' any channel <br />dam. may'.\be constructed. ' <br />5. No adjudication of water: in <br /> <br />/ <br /> <br />. the South Platte hasin shall be <br />~ade to any federal agency or pro- <br />Ject controlIed by such ag'ency. <br />~. .~ands and irrigatiari water <br />prioritIes obtained by any federal <br />agency through conde'mliation <br />: must be replaced "in kind" If <br />, f d . a <br />e er?I agency is empowered to <br />, pror~lIse replacement "in kind" to <br />a raI.lroad, why not offer the same <br />, deal to individuals who have their <br />!I entire sa~irigs and livelihood de- <br />I pendent On their farm? <br />Furthermore the flood problem <br />~or .Morgan an~ adjOining counties <br />IS not solved by the present pro- <br />posed .Narrows dam. The Bijo'u <br />.a~d .Kiowa creeks have their be- <br />gmmng about 90 miles south Of: <br />Fort Morgan at an elevation of aI- I <br />~ost a,ooo feet. The point of del- <br />Ivery of the flood waters behind <br />the proposed dam is a little over <br />4,000 feet. Thus the damage to <br />!. Morgan and adjacent counties has <br />already occurred before any con- <br />trol would be possible. <br />, . <br /> <br />. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.