Laserfiche WebLink
<br />both species are probably a transient rather than permanent resident popula- :! <br /> <br />tion. Thus, the small amount of water depleted from this one mile section <br /> <br />" <br />" <br /> <br />of river will probably have a negligible effect on the existing transient <br /> <br />populations of razorback suckers or Colorado squawfish. <br /> <br />As stated previously the Black Rocks area in Ruby Canyon of the Colorado <br /> <br />:i <br /> <br />River near the Colorado/Utah state line appears to be <br /> <br />habitat <br /> <br />for humpback chub. This area also appears to be <br /> <br />habitat for Colorado <br /> <br />squawfish (Valdez, personal communication, October 1979) as recent collections <br /> <br />~ .i <br /> <br />have included adult, juvenile and young of the year squawfish. Table 4 shows <br /> <br />l'.l <br />" <br />" <br /> <br />f~ <br /> <br />the pre- and post- Dallas Creek Project flows at the State line. Changes due <br /> <br />.~ <br /> <br />to the project again appear to be negligible and will undoubtedly have little <br /> <br />~! <br />~' <br />" <br /> <br />,.,' <br /> <br />or no effect on these two populations. <br /> <br />, <br /> <br />To date, no viable populations of bony tail chub have been located <br /> <br />~ <br />~~ <br />~ <br />""!'- <br /> <br />in the Upper Colorado River Basin. However, small isolated populations may <br /> <br />exist below the confluence of the Gunnison River. As noted above, the project <br /> <br />(~ <br />r., <br />,- <br />r.:" <br /> <br />The project would have a small effect on the total dissolved solid (TDS) <br /> <br />r <br />fo: <br />t~ <br />"> <br />~'" <br />f'!! <br />" <br />?~ <br />f~ <br />~ <br />,~ <br />~~ <br />~1i <br />~.,~ <br />.:.p <br />"!--:. <br />;~'X' <br /> <br />flows in this area will change very little from the present flows and this <br /> <br />will have little or no effect on any resident bony tail chub population. <br /> <br />concentrations in the Gunnison and Colorado Rivers by salt loading and cone en- <br /> <br />tration due to water use and removal. An increase in TDS concentration of <br /> <br />10.7 mg/l at Grand Junction, Colorado, 4.4 mg/l at Cisco, Utah, and 2.7 mg/l <br /> <br />at Imperial Dam is predicted as a result of the project. All four species in <br /> <br />question apparently have a wide tolerance range for total dissolved solids. <br /> <br />For instance, the Colorado squawfish and the razorback sucker have been collected <br /> <br />in water ranging from 200 to 1700 mg/l while a thriving population of humpback <br /> <br />chubs live in the Little Colorado River where the TDS is as high as 2500 mg/l. <br /> <br />20 <br />