My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
WSP11446
CWCB
>
Water Supply Protection
>
Backfile
>
11000-11999
>
WSP11446
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/26/2010 3:17:29 PM
Creation date
10/12/2006 4:59:02 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Water Supply Protection
File Number
8220.112.I
Description
Dallas Creek Participating Project
State
CO
Basin
Gunnison
Water Division
4
Date
10/1/1979
Author
USDOI-BOR
Title
Endangered Species Assessment: Dallas Creek Project Colorado
Water Supply Pro - Doc Type
Report/Study
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
52
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />An IFG4 habitat station was established on the Gunnison River at <br /> <br />Whitewater in 1977 in cooperation with the Fish and Wildlife Service. <br /> <br />This methodology is designed to predict habitat conditions in a stream <br /> <br />at different flows. However, with the present extremely limited life history <br /> <br />and habitat preference information available for the Colorado squawfish, <br /> <br />data derived from the IFG4 model must be utilized only as a fair approxima- <br /> <br />'I <br /> <br />tion of the amount of available habitat. The model indicated that adult <br /> <br />squawfish habitat was optimum (5500 square feet) at approximately 1500 cfs <br /> <br />while juvenile habitat was optimum (10,000 square feet) at approximately <br /> <br />600 cfs (Figure 2). However, the model predicted little or no available <br /> <br />habitat for fry. At the established Dallas Creek project flows, the amount <br /> <br />'I <br />~ I <br />,I <br /> <br />of available habitat for adult squawfish appears to be near optimum while <br /> <br />that for juveniles appear to be adequate. <br /> <br />Table 3 shows the pre- and post-project flows below the Redlands Diversion <br /> <br />on the Gunnison River. This is approximately one mile above the river's con- <br /> <br />, <br />. <br />> <br />. <br /> <br />~' I <br /> <br />fluence with the Colorado River. Historically, this one mile section periodically <br /> <br />, <br /> <br />il <br /> <br />experiences extremely low flows during the late summer months. For instance, <br /> <br />~ <br /> <br />during August and September of 1977 flows were measured at 8 cfs. During the <br /> <br />~ <br />~ <br />~ <br />" <br />I , <br />~ <br />c <br />~ <br /> <br />period of record (1952-1977), these extremely low flows occurred 6 times <br /> <br />(Appendix B). The frequency of this occurrence will not increase with the <br /> <br />p <br />~ <br />t <br />~ <br />~ <br />. <br />~ <br /> <br />project. In fact with the project on line during the period of record it <br /> <br />~ <br /> <br />would happen only 5 times in the 20 years. During these: extremely dry years <br /> <br />~ <br /> <br />and probably most years, these fish populations undoubtedly migrate back to <br /> <br />the Colorado River as flows are progressively reduced during the irrigation <br /> <br />season. Indeed, it would be reasonable to assume that the present population of <br /> <br />, I <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.