Laserfiche WebLink
<br /> <br />This second chart (Exhibit 6) shows the same conditions adapted <br />to the construction of the principal channel storage at the Narrows <br />site. We see about the same storable flows and remaining demands <br />immediately below Denver indicating a need for'storage facilities <br />at this point by 1990. The possible exchange, however, is somewhat <br />different, 22,000 acre-feet can be exchanged with the Narrows site <br />instead of 15,000 acre-feet for the Weld County site. Seven- <br />thousand acre-feet could be exchanged to the Bijou and Riverside <br />Canals, the remaining 15,000 acre-feet could be exchanged further <br />upstream ElS far as the Burlington Canal. Below the Narrows site <br />we see the lines drop to zero until a point slightly below the <br />North Sterling Canal is reached, showing that that canal and all <br />can!jls diverting between it and the dam could be fully served. <br /> <br />Again we see both curves rising indicating that features could <br />be of service in the area below Sterling and in the vicinity of <br />Julesburg if they were found to be economically feasible. <br /> <br />The following three speakers will go into the details of <br />the study. The first will outline the purpose and some of the <br />procedures used in the studies. The next speaker will explain <br />some of the more interesting conclusions of our municipal effects <br />study, and the third will explain the criteria and results of the <br />reservoir operation studies. <br /> <br />TRANSITIONAL REMARKS BY MR. GREER <br /> <br />Mr. Madsen will, at this time, outline in general terms the <br />purpose of, and procedures used, in the studies. <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />.12 <br /> <br />