Laserfiche WebLink
<br /> <br />4. <br /> <br /> <br />~, <br /> <br />The Ultimate Time Level was established by criteria as <br />the end of the Bureau of Reclamation repayment period for the <br />unit. This was established by assuming that the reservoir could <br />be in operation by 1970; that a 5-year delay in commencement of <br />repayment or development period would be needed and that the <br />repayment period would be for 50 years. This gives an ultil]l8te <br />time level of 2025. The intermediate and ultimate time levels <br />bota assume Two Forks Reservoir in operation and are considered <br />only in this manner. <br /> <br />A number of detail studies were necessary to make up our <br />ideal demand and storage study and we have some interesting <br />charts to show later regarding this Ideal Demand and Storage <br />Study. <br /> <br />There are, however, certain conditions which must be <br />explained before we consider the results of all these studies. <br />These are outlined in Exhibit 4. Two Forks Reservoir or a <br />similar facility was assumed to be in operation for all conditions. <br />First we studied the 1990 level without a project, and with a <br />project. Under the with project we have the alternate Weld County <br />and Narrows conditions. Under each of these we have without <br />reservoir replacement and with 'reservoir replacement. The with <br />reservoir replacement consisted for the ,Weld County site of moving <br />the Empire, Riverside and Bijou Reservoir storage space into <br />Weld County Reservoir, and eliminating these three reservoirs. <br />The with reservoir replacement for the Narrows site consisted <br />only of eliminating Jackson Reservoir and transferring its space <br />to the Narrows site. Under each of the with reservoir replacement <br />conditions we have with and without added facilities upstream. <br />These consist of facilities to use 15,000 acre-feet additional <br />water at the 1990 level on lands served through the Burlington <br />ditch and added facilities to enable the St. Vrain, Clear Creek, <br />and Big Thompson to use 10 percent of their outflow when available. <br /> <br />Our results are based on the precept that neither site <br />would be built without including 'the reservoir replacement. The <br />,lower portion of Exhibit 4 shows the remaining basin shortages <br />determined in each study. The historica;L basin shortages are <br />394,000 acre-feet; 153,000 above Weld County site, 49,000 between <br />the sites and 192,000 below the Narrows site. With reservoir <br />replacement at the two sites at the 1990 level, we have a remaining <br />shortage of 144,000 acre-feet for Weld County and 153,000 for <br />Narrows. These are shortages, so under this condition Weld County <br />is 9,000 acre-feet better per year than Narrows. If we add <br />facilities upstream to use more water in the tributaries, the <br />remaintng shortages in the lower basin, of course, increase, and <br />Weld County has remaining shortages of 175,000 acre-feet, while <br />Narrows has remaining shortages of l87,000 acre-feet. <br />