Laserfiche WebLink
<br />00628 <br /> <br />do so should be provided, Residents of the metro, <br />politan Denver area are entitled to a water supply <br />sufficient for residential, commercial and industrial <br />uses, and the water to maintain the environment <br />and quality of life bequeathed to us by our prede. <br />cessors. In Denver's semi-arid climate, water is <br />essential to maintain our greenery, which counters <br />air pollution by producing oxygen and reducing <br />dust in the air. <br />THE COUNC1L BELlEVES that local govern. <br />ment officials and the water agencies which serve <br />their communities are legally and morally bound <br />to provide an adequate water supply, If the Foot. <br />hills project is not approved, their responsibility <br />will be extremely difficult to meet, and there could <br />be periodic water shortages through the 1980's, <br />THE COUNCIL BELlEVES that, even with sub- <br />stantial and permanent conservation of water by <br />everyone, additional water supply and treatment <br />capacity will be needed to serve a higher popula. <br />tion expected between now and the year 2000, <br />The additional three increments of 125 MGD <br />each, bringing the total Foothills capacity to 500 <br />l'vlGD, should be built when needed, but to serve <br />actual additional population only if it increases as <br />anticipated, <br />THE COUNCIL BELIEVES that water used for <br />irrigation of lawns, flowers, shrubs and trees in nor- <br />mal runoff years provides a "r.eservoirl> to be drawn <br />upon in drought years, preventing hardships such <br />as those now being experienced in Marin County. <br />California, where they voted down two bond issues. <br /> <br />Denver, by contrast, passed a bond issue for Foot. <br />hills in 1973, but we will still have water shortages <br />for several years, <br />THE COUNCIL BELIEVES that the current <br />water restrictions are prudent measures to alleviate <br />the effects of the drought and to offset the effects <br />of limited treatment capacity due to the Foothills <br />project delay, <br />THE COUNC1L BELIEVES that areas must be <br />provided for wildlife habitat, but that human needs <br />must be considered as well. The area involved in <br />the Foothills treatment plant, Strontia Springs <br />Dam and Reservoir and the water conveyance tun- <br />nel can accommodate these manmade structures <br />with reasonable provisions for fish, Rocky Moun- <br />tain Sheep and other wildlife in the area, <br />THE COUNCIL BELIEVES that the availability <br />of an adequate water supply is not the cause of <br />growth or air pollution or any other urban and <br />suburban problems, nor that water supply in itself <br />creates a demand for other governmental services, <br />There is no essential cause-effect relationship <br />between the 125 l'vlGD Foothills facilities and the <br />proposed Two Forks project. Foothills is justified <br />on its own merits, and Two Forks should be judged <br />on its merits, Trying to stop Two Forks by stop. <br />ping Foothills is not a proper or responsible course <br />of action. <br /> <br />Below is the artist's conception of the Foothills <br />treatment plant to be located in the southwestern <br />portion of the metro area, <br /> <br /> <br />