My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
WSP11373
CWCB
>
Water Supply Protection
>
Backfile
>
11000-11999
>
WSP11373
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/26/2010 3:17:11 PM
Creation date
10/12/2006 4:56:04 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Water Supply Protection
File Number
8042.A
Description
Section D General Studies - Other States
State
AZ
Basin
Statewide
Date
11/17/1960
Author
AZ Interstate Stream
Title
Thirteenth Annual Report of the Arizona Interstate Stream Commission - July 1 1959 to June 30 1960
Water Supply Pro - Doc Type
Annual Report
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
81
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />o 0] 8 5 ;, <br /> <br />It took neal"ly 2J/J. years Lo try the. case-from June 11, <br />19fiG, to August 28,1958. To be :"Lire, the trial was not eonducted <br />continuoLlsly. It proceeded in illcl'ement~ of about thref' weeks <br />each. with recesses between to enahle the aU(wneys to prepare <br />for the next ses~ions and to permit Jtldg~ Rifkind to attend tu <br />hifi private law practice in New York. <br />There were. in all, 132 trial days. The tran:->cript of test.i- <br />mon~' filled 22,593 page~. In addition, ::'..742 pag~s of testimollY <br />were taken ill cOnJlection with depositions involving the Gila <br />Rh'er issne at Silvt!r Citv and Reserve. N. Mex. The Mastel' <br />heard 106 \\;jtnesse~, aJlcl~ an additional 234 witnes:.;es testified <br />in the New I\Iexko depositions. Some 4.000 exhilJits were intro- <br />duced. Between :::0 and 40 attornf'Ys participated ill t-n!? trial. <br />(Many mure, especially in Califortli<l. toiled behind I.ne ~ceJles. <br />in research, preparation of pleading-s. etc. Indeed, a San Fral'.- <br />cisco newspaper columni~t observed, at the time the Ma:-;ter':-; <br />drclft report was is:.;ued. that "liltle Al'izflna had seven lawyer,:..; <br />working on the ca~e [while] Califol'nia had, all told, some <br />SO-odd.") <br />All ill all, the Colorado River case was olle of the large:'l <br />and mo~t involved in tne hi.~tf}n' of A mel'ican water ruri:-;- <br />~ll'lldellce. ' . <br />After the t('illl ended. briefs were exchangerl and proposed <br />findings of fact and conclusions of law were submitted tn the <br />Ma:'lter. By July 1, 1959. the issue,:.; had been fully drawn and <br />the matter was ready for c()llsideration. <br />It took the Master i:I little (j\Tr 10 month:.; v) sift throug:11 <br />t.he veritable mflllntain of e\'identc. sort out the variolls legal <br />contention~, anive at hi~ own c()nclu~iGn~ ,lnd lJrepare a draCt <br />report. <br />On May 9, 1!)60-11early eight "'ear,,, after the start of the <br />litigation-the draft repL)rt waR relrased. Under the assllmptio.l <br />that the report i~ submitted to the Court and approved. it will <br />be a tremendous vidol'Y for Al'izona-an acknowledgment 1)[ <br />Ollr rights to Colorado River wafer ~llc.;h as Arizl.llWllS ha\'e <br />worked and hoped for :;ince eal'l~" ill the century. <br />Headlines in new~paJlers across thr country 311gge~ted the <br />extent to which Arizona's I)ositioll w,\s uphpld in the Mastel"~ <br />re port: <br />ARIZONA IS VICTOR IN CLAIM TO IV ATER OF THE <br />COLOR A nO--New York Time, <br />ARIZONA WATER WINNER.-Arize,na Republic <br />ARIZO:'-lA WINS COLORADO R1V8R WATERS: CALI- <br />FORNIA REBUFFED-Ariz,>!,,, Daily Star <br />CALIFORNIA LOS8S TO AIUZONA ON WATETt-L"s <br />Angp.le,~ Examiner <br />ARIZONA WINS IN RULIN(; ON II' A TERS OF COLO. <br />RA DO--Lo~ Angeles Tinw::-; <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.