Laserfiche WebLink
<br />f,~ <br /><'1 <br /> <br />, <br /> <br />Archaeology in the Grand Canyon <br /> <br />By: Chris Coder, Project Archaeologist <br />Grand Canyon National Park <br /> <br />As part of the Glen Canyon Environmental Studies, the <br />National Parle Service, with support from Northern <br />Arizona University, conducted an intensive archaeolog- <br />ical survey along the Colorado River corridor between Glen <br />Canyon Dam and Separation Canyon from August 1990 to May <br />1991. The survey, completed in compliance with the National <br />Historic Preservation Act, provided infonnation for impact <br />analysis for the Opemtion of Glen Canyon Dam Environmental <br />Impact Statement. <br /> <br />The survey documented 475 archaeological sites over a 255- <br />mile stletch of the rivet Archaeological field CleWS covered the <br />rough and beautiful terrain from the water's edge up to the hypo- <br />thetical 300,000 cubic feet per second (cfs) level. The upper sur- <br />vey line varied depending on the corridor width at river level and <br />the Canyon caprice with regard to rock slides, debris flows, cliff <br />faces, and density of vegetation. As anyone who has hiked <br />along the river knows, it is nearly impossible to walk in a <br />straight line on the slopes of the inner Canyon. . Few people have <br />the opportunity to walk the entire length of the Grand Canyon; <br />and for evetyone participating in the survey, it was an honor to <br />do so. Despite fonnidable logistical obstacles-intense heat and <br />freezing cold, mging rapids, and leg-wrecking rock--the project <br />came in on time, on budget, and without serious mishap. <br /> <br />"This survey scrotinized a slice of the Colomdo Plateau as never <br />before, creating a clearer picture of human histoty in the <br />Canyon. Unique rock art, prehistoric villages, pot caches, rock <br />shelters, roasting features, historic mining camps, and inscrip- <br />tions were located and recorded. Yet, the work is not finished; <br />nor is the stoty of the erosional processes of the Canyon and <br />their long-term effects on archaeological sites. <br /> <br />Monitoring Program <br /> <br />After completing the survey, evaluation of potential impacts to <br />archaeological sites led to development of a programmatic <br />agreement which guides long-term monitoring and stabilization <br />of cultural resources in the river corridor. A unique aspect of the <br />program is the coopemtive nature of the project which includes <br />Reclamation (lead agency); National Parle Service (principal <br />land manager); Arizona State Historic Preservation Officer <br />(SHPO); Havasupai, Hopi, and Hnalapai Tnbes; Kalbab Paiute; <br />Navajo Nation; San Juan Southern Paiute; Shivwits Paiute; Zuni <br />Pueblo; and the Advisety Council on Historic Preservation. <br /> <br />Project archaeologists work closely with U.S. Geological <br />Swvey geologists Richard Hereford and Ivo Lucchitta and their <br />respective teams conducting geomOlphological studies at sever- <br />allocations along the river. Of particular value is the detailed <br />mapping and description of the depositional sequences at <br />Nankoweap, Palisades, and the area around and including <br />Granite Parle. <br /> <br />Of the 475 sites, 263 are located on river-deposited sediment <br />accumulated over the centuries prior to Glen Canyon Dam~ The <br />dam now traps sediment on its upstream side. As the old blan- <br />ket of protective sand is blown away, a new supply is not avail- <br />able to replace it This loss of sediment working in tandem with <br />a regime of artificial flows puts the archaeological sites at risk. <br />The test flow scheduled for the spring of 1996 may rectify this <br />problem to some degree by replenishing the beaches. <br /> <br />On-site monitoring has continued since the initial survey, with <br />completion of a field monitoring form and "same location" pho- <br />togmphs to observe changes over the course of time. In addi- <br />tion, archaeologists make detailed maps of selected sites and <br />recommend erosion control measures at threatened sites. <br /> <br />Stabilization Workshop <br /> <br />In May 1995, Reclamation and the Parle Service conducted a sta- <br />bilization workshop on erosion control techniques to develop a <br />strategy to protect archaeological sites at risk in the river corri- <br />dor. Key to this approach is the Zuni Pueblo Soil Conservation <br />Program which pioneered low impact techniques using natura1- <br />ly occurring materials to cwb the destructive results of erosion. <br /> <br />Workshop participants reconvened on September 12 to field test <br />erosion control techniques on archaeological sites near Palisades <br />Creek. Progranunatic agreement representatives and Forest <br />Service personnel launched six oarllOwered boats from Lees <br />Feny for the trip to Palisades Creek for 3 days of labor-intensive <br />rehabilitation work. Zuni rehabilitation methods were utilized <br />as well as the tried and tested techniques established by the <br />Grand Canyon National Parle's rehabilitation specialists. <br /> <br />Over 100 tons of locally procured rock, brosh, and logs were <br />transformed into 70 checkdams. Several styles of checks were <br />constroctoo to fit each erosional feature in a manner appropriate <br />to each particular circumstance. <br /> <br />(conw.ued on page 8) <br /> <br />7 <br />