Laserfiche WebLink
<br />l <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />111 <br />il <br />II <br />I' <br />I <br />r: <br />i <br /> <br />,-- " 1 <br />':'w:'! <br /> <br />HYDROGRAPHY <br /> <br />63 <br /> <br />,.,'. <br /> <br /> <br />_ ____ ____ JhU..:-_5, Vici"!j..i!lI-.!!J~GCllcJ!.-nd CO/2Pm- Basi-n rcscr'd..qir~ ___ <br /> <br />~\ <br />r l <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />aqueduct diversion for the water year 1952 was 191,758 acre-feet, <br />a decrease of 9 per cent compared with the previous year. For <br />the fiscal year ending June 80,1952, the gross diversion was 217,260 <br />acre-feet. Measured return flow for the fiscal year 1952 was 6,118 <br />acre-feet and for the water year 1952 was 5,974, indicating respec- <br />tive net diversions of 211,142 and 185,779 acre-feet, the latter item <br />being listed in table 14 in rounded form. <br />The measured return flow includes the Intake pumping plant <br />cooling water which returns directly to the plant forebay and Lake <br />HavaslI, after having been recorded as diverted by the plant's <br />venturi meters. The recorded flow of such cooling water for the <br />12 months ending September 80, 1952 was 850 acre-feet, or approx- <br />imately 0.5 per cent of the gross pumpage. Additional return flow <br />