Laserfiche WebLink
<br />I\j <br />""'" <br />co <br />o <br /> <br />through 19~5 with the 1965 level of depletions, Information compiled <br />in Comprehensive Framework Studies was used as a basis for establish- <br />ing the means at major streamflow stations, Below Hoover Dam, the <br />data used ~ere those subsequent to 1960 when deliveries to Mexico were <br />reduced to, about 1.5 million acre-feet in anticipation of the closure <br />of Glen Cahyon Dam and which reflect a relatively homogeneous condi- <br />tion, The values obtained were then adjusted to reflect a 1970 level <br />of development, As completed, the data used for the model primarily <br />represent ~ean streamflow for the 1914 to 1965 period modified to <br />reflect a 1965 level of development and the 110,000 acre-foot diversion <br />of the San;Juan-Chama Project in the Upper Basin, and a 1970 level <br />of development in the Lower Basin, As used in the simulation model, <br />these data, therefore require that all projected depletions in the <br />Upper Basin reflect the amounts beyond the 1965 level (except for <br />San Juan-Chama which is provided for in the data) and those for the <br />Lower Basi~ the amounts beyond 1970. <br /> <br />Adpustment of Means <br /> <br />The general pattern of the change in the means of streamflow due to <br />man's activity would be to reduce the values during high flow periods <br />and slightiy reduce or maintain those of low flow periods, Time <br />limitation~, however, precluded an extensive effort to determine just <br />how the monthly means of each station should be adjusted to reflect <br />man's acti~ity, Therefore, the approach used for the present data <br />base was to adjust the means by the same factor throughout the year, <br />In the approximate fashion, this constant factor approach is in the <br />right direction, but the results should not be considered as an exact <br />estimate of the means. <br /> <br />3.2.1 <br /> <br />For quality, besides the adjustment needed to reflect man's activities, <br />there is also a need to modify the data to reflect the same flow <br />conditions'portrayed in the adjusted streamflow data. Time trends <br />of the residuals of the correlations between the random components of <br />flow and q~ality were computed for some of the stations in the Upper <br />Basin to d~termine if the quality means should be increased to <br />represent the 1965 level of quality. Rather than showing a deteri- <br />oration of:quality with time, the trends showed either no change or a <br />slight improvement. From these results it was concluded that the <br />means for the period of record would provide a good representation of <br />present-day quality in the Basin and that an adjustment to the data <br />to reflect man's activities was not needed, However, the data do <br />show that ~here is an inverse relationship between flow and quality - <br />the quality concentrations are smaller during high runoff years and <br />months, an9 larger during low runoff years and months. Since the <br />mean strea~flows of the period for which quality data are available <br />are generally lower than the mean streamflows portrayed in the adjusted <br />streamflow1data, the inverse relationships were used to adjust the <br /> <br />17 <br /> <br />w. ~,.,_,"'" L". ___'., . <br /> <br />