My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
WSP11325
CWCB
>
Water Supply Protection
>
Backfile
>
11000-11999
>
WSP11325
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/26/2010 3:16:59 PM
Creation date
10/12/2006 4:53:29 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Water Supply Protection
File Number
8443.400
Description
Narrows Unit - Reports
State
CO
Basin
South Platte
Water Division
1
Date
3/1/1978
Author
Woodward-Clyde Consu
Title
Review Of Data And Studies Developed By The Bureau Of Reclamation For The Feasibility Stage Design Of Narrows Dam Colorado
Water Supply Pro - Doc Type
Report/Study
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
45
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />. <br /> <br />Woodward.CIyde Consultants <br /> <br />0088 <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />IV. STABILITY OF DOWNSTREAM SLOPE <br /> <br />We reviewed the Bureau's evaluation of the stability of <br /> <br />the downstream slope at the maximum section of the dam for <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />steady state conditions by conducting independent stability <br /> <br />analyses. Several failure surfaces with varying strength <br /> <br />parameters were studied utilizing computerized programs for <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />circular arc and composite failure surfaces. In our analyses <br /> <br />we used the parameters given in Table 2 and as shown on <br /> <br />Figure 5. Further, we investigated stability conditions <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />utilizing horizontal force earthquake factors of zero, 0.025 <br /> <br />and 0.05g. A steady state flow net similar to that used by the <br /> <br />Bureau was considered to be reasonable and was used in our <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />analyses. <br />The results of our stability analyses are recorded on <br /> <br />Figure 5. In all cases, not including assumed earthquake <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />forces, the ratios of theoretical resisting forces divided by <br /> <br />theoretical driving forces were greater than 1.5. In the <br /> <br />analysis of failure surface "1" (see Figure 5) we took into <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />consideration the two seismic coefficients in conventional <br /> <br />pseudostatic analyses. The document "Earthquake Design and <br /> <br />Analysis for Corps of Engineers Dams," previously discussed on <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />p. 10 utilizes a seismic coefficient of 0.025 for dams in <br /> <br />Seismic Zone 1. For this case the ratio of theoretical <br /> <br />resisting forces to theoretical resisting forces was 1.46. We <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />believe the risk of earthquake induced ground motions adversely <br /> <br />affecting the stability of the dam is very low. <br /> <br />- 19 - <br /> <br />I1Dt. <br />... <br /> <br />. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.