Laserfiche WebLink
<br />I <br />I <br />, <br />I <br />I <br />, <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I. <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I, <br />I <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />C. Pulllose and Need for Proposed Action <br /> <br />The proposed rule would establish a procedural framework to be followed in the development <br />and review of interstate agreements for off stream storage of Colorado River water allocated to <br />but not otherwise used by water entitlement holders within the State where the water is to be <br />stored, It also provides for off stream storage of unused basic apportionment or unused surplus <br />apportionment by an authorized entity in a Lower Division State on behalf of an authorized <br />entity in another Lower Division State. In an interstate transaction authorized by the proposed <br />rule, the authorized entity paying to store the water would develop storage credits which may be <br />redeemed in the future with Colorado River water for use in another State. The proposed rule is <br />based on the understanding that this type of off stream storage is a beneficial use of Colorado <br />River water. In addition, an authorized entity would be able to store Colorado River water <br />off stream at its own expense and develop storage credits on its own, The entity could later <br />redeem those storage credits from an authorized entity in another Lower Division State, Any <br />redemption of storage credits from an authorized entity in one Lower Division State to an <br />authorized entity in another Lower Division State must be in accordance with the BCP A, the <br />Decree, other applicable laws (including State laws), and the terms and conditions of interstate <br />storage agreements among authorized entities, Such agreements would be subject to approval by <br />the Secretary. Consistent with the BCP A, the Decree, and all other applicable laws, the <br />Secretary would operate the Colorado River to make unused apportionment available in a <br />manner that-would permit the redemption of storage credits held in one Lower Division State for <br />use by authorized entities in another Lower Division State, <br /> <br />The procedures contained in the proposed rule would apply to all entities with entitlements to <br />use Colorado River water in the Lower Division States, The proposed rule is permissive in <br />nature and is intended to encourage and facilitate voluntary interstate water transactions to better <br />accommodate regional water needs, <br /> <br />The proposed rule is designed to help the Secretary more efficiently fulfill his responsibilities to <br />manage the Colorado River. The actions and transactions contemplated under the proposed rule <br />are within the current authority of the Secretary, the BCP A, and Decree. The Decree confirmed <br />that the Secretary was entrusted with sufficient authority and given the responsibility to direct, <br />manage, and coordinate the operation of dams and related works on the Colorado River in the <br />Lower Basin. The Supreme Court concluded, among other things, that the Secretary derives <br />significant authority from the contract authority under section 5 of the BCP A that requires water <br />users in the Lower Basin to have a contract with the Secretary. The Supreme Court further <br />concluded that Congress intended the Secretary, through the Secretary's section 5 contract <br />power, to carry out the allocation of the waters of the mainstream of the Colorado River among <br />the Lower Basin States and to decide which water users within each State would receive <br />contracts. Accordingly, the Secretary acts as water master of the Colorado River in the <br />Lower Basin, <br /> <br />LC Region DEAIl <br /> <br />3 <br /> <br />12/97 <br />