My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
WSP11307
CWCB
>
Water Supply Protection
>
Backfile
>
11000-11999
>
WSP11307
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/26/2010 3:16:54 PM
Creation date
10/12/2006 4:52:56 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Water Supply Protection
File Number
8200.300.10.A
Description
Colorado River Basin Legislation/Law - Interstate Water Transfers
Basin
Colorado Mainstem
Date
12/1/1997
Author
USDOI/BOR
Title
Draft: Programmatic Environmental Assessment for Proposed Rule Making for Offstream Storage of Colorado River Water and Interstate Redemption of Storage Credits in the Lower Division States
Water Supply Pro - Doc Type
Publication
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
71
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />No Action Alternative <br /> <br />Under the No Action Alternative the proposed rule would not be implemented and there would <br />be no Federal undertaking to impact cultural resources. Arizona and California entities may <br />construct off stream storage facilities for their own needs that could impact cultural resources. <br />The State entities would be the action agencies and consult with SHPO's through established <br />State procedures. It is possible that off stream storage credits could be developed between <br />California and Nevada for interstate redemption purposes without the proposed rule. <br />Reclamation would initiate the Section 106 process and consult with the SHPO on a case-by- <br />case basis, <br /> <br />4. Indian Sacred Sites <br /> <br />Reclamation is required, to the extent practicable, permitted by law, and not clearly inconsistent <br />with essential agency functions, to avoid adversely affecting the physical integrity ofIndian <br />sacred sites and to allow access by Indian religious practioners to such sacred sites (Executive <br />Order 13007), <br /> <br />Preferred Alternative <br /> <br />Implementation of the Preferred Alternative would not have adverse impacts on Indian sacred <br />sites or access to such sites. There would be no change in current conditions in relationship to <br />this issue, <br /> <br />No Action Alternative <br /> <br />It is possible that off stream storage credits could be developed between California and Nevada <br />for interstate redemption purposes without the proposed rule, Reclamation would address this <br />issue in an appropriate NEP A document for such actions on a case-by-case basis, <br /> <br />5. Environmental Justice <br /> <br />Federal Actions to Address Environmental Justice in Minority Populations and Low-Income <br />Populations (Executive Order 12898) was signed on February 11, 1994 and amended on <br />January 30, 1995, In general, Federal agencies shall make achieving environmental justice part <br />of their missions by identifYing and addressing, as appropriate, disproportionately high and <br />adverse human health or environmental effects of its programs, policies, and activities on <br />minority populations and low-income populations in the United States and its territories and <br />possessions. <br /> <br />In accordance with Executive Order 12898 and Reclamation policy (pEP-No, ECM 95-3), all <br />NEP A documents shall consider the impacts of Federal actions on minority and low-income <br />populations and communities, as well as the equity of the distribution of benefits and risks of <br />those actions, <br /> <br />LC Region DEAl 1 <br /> <br />23 <br /> <br />12/97 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.