My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
WSP11304
CWCB
>
Water Supply Protection
>
Backfile
>
11000-11999
>
WSP11304
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/26/2010 3:16:54 PM
Creation date
10/12/2006 4:52:24 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Water Supply Protection
File Number
8220.100.50
Description
CRSP - Power Marketing
Basin
Colorado Mainstem
Date
2/1/1986
Author
USDOI/WAPA
Title
SLCA Integrated Projects Marketing and Allocation Criteria
Water Supply Pro - Doc Type
Publication
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
138
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />upon existing customers. The Criteria also recognize the equity of <br /> <br /> <br />selling Federal power to entities that were unahle to contract for <br /> <br /> <br />power earlier. The Criteria attempt to strike a balance between needs <br /> <br /> <br />of existing and potential customers. <br /> <br />(e) Former Secretary of Energy Hodel's Remarks. The <br />IOU alleged that the proposed preference criteria were prejudged and <br />predetermined by then-Secretary of Energy Hodel before the IOU had an <br />opportunity to comment. This allegation is based on remarks made by <br />Secretary Hodel at a May 3, 1983, meeting of the American Public Power <br />Associ~tion, in which he expresses general support for the preference <br />clause. Western does not see anything arbitrary, capricious, <br />improper, or illegal in a Secretary's statement that he supports the <br />laws he is required to administer. <br /> <br />(f) "Yardstick Competition." The IOU argues that <br />the concept that preference 1 aws promote "yardst i ck compet it i on" is an <br />anachronism. This same commenter previously argued that certain <br />congressional purposes in enacting the DOE Act in 1977, found at 42 <br />U.S.C. '7112, were very important. One of the purposes, mentioned at <br />section 102(12), was "to foster and assure competition among parties <br />engaged in the supply of energy and fuel s." We have recent <br />legislation, therefore, which indicates that Congress does not <br />consider the concept of competition to be anachronistic. In any <br />event, Western is not in any position to second-guess Congress on the <br />competition issue. Western is legally bound to uphold the preference <br /> <br />19 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.