My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
WSP11304
CWCB
>
Water Supply Protection
>
Backfile
>
11000-11999
>
WSP11304
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/26/2010 3:16:54 PM
Creation date
10/12/2006 4:52:24 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Water Supply Protection
File Number
8220.100.50
Description
CRSP - Power Marketing
Basin
Colorado Mainstem
Date
2/1/1986
Author
USDOI/WAPA
Title
SLCA Integrated Projects Marketing and Allocation Criteria
Water Supply Pro - Doc Type
Publication
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
138
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />functions, purposes, and responsibility to be assigned among the <br />Secretary's staff. Nothing in the language of section 102 or in the <br />legislative history of the DOE Act suggests that any amendment to the <br />Federal preference laws was intended to result from the listing of <br />purposes. <br /> <br />In any event, these marketing criteria are consistent with the <br />congressional purposes of sections 102(4), (14), and (16). The <br />criteria contain incentives for prospective customers to develop <br />renewable resources and conservation programs and penalties for <br />failure to implement C&RE programs in accordance with established <br />Gui del i nes and Acceptance Criteri a. . The "product i ve capacity of <br />private enterprise" is and will continue to be employed to transmit <br />SLCA Integrated Projects energy and also, when economical, for <br />purchases of firming capacity and energy. The energy needs of many <br />rural and urban residents will be recognized and cared for through the <br />allocations of power to preference entities such as municipalities and <br />rural electric cooperatives. <br /> <br />(b) The Reclamation Project Act of 1939. An IOU <br />commenter asserted that, under the preference provisions of 43 U.S.C. <br />48Sh(c), the 143 municipalities on behalf of which the IOU applied for <br />power were entitled to preference and to equal treatment with other <br />preference entities applying for power although none of the <br />municipalities owned its own distribution system or had previously <br />assumed any utility responsibilities. The IOU also asserted that <br /> <br />14 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.