Laserfiche WebLink
<br />:~~t;;~ <br />Number <br />1 <br />2 <br />3 <br />4 <br />5 <br />6 <br />7 <br />8 <br />9 <br />10 <br />11 <br />12 <br />13 <br />14 <br />15 <br />16 <br />17 <br />18 <br />19 <br />20 <br />21 <br />22 <br />23 <br />24 <br />25 <br />26 <br />27 <br />28 <br />29 <br /> <br />TABLES <br /> <br />Uinta Basin Unit existing irrigation systems <br />investigated for possible canal lining. . . . . . <br />Salinity control standards on the Lower Colorado <br />River . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . <br /> <br />Mean annual salinity at Imperial Dam.. ..... <br />Annual preproject water and salt budget . .. .. <br />Canals and laterals to be lined under the <br />recommended plan. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . <br />Lengths and capacities of canals to 'be lined. . . <br />Additional acreage needed for project features. . <br />Estimated construction costs. . . . . . . . . . . <br />Annual operation, maintenance, and replacement <br /> <br />costs . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . <br /> <br />. . . . <br /> <br />Incremental cost-effectiveness analysis . . . . . . <br />Cost allocation and repayment . . . . . . . . . . . <br />Estimated salt load contribution under the <br />no-action alternative . . . . . . . . . . . . . . <br />Summary comparison of recommended plan and <br />no-action alternative . . . . . . . . . . . . . . <br />Uinta Basin Unit salt removal benefits. . . . <br />Beneficial and adverse effects. . . . . . <br />Environmental Quality Account . . . . . . . . <br />Regional economic development analysis of the <br />recommended plan. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . <br />Quantitative social impact analysis for Duchesne <br />County. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . <br />Additional increments considered for recommended <br /> <br />. . <br /> <br />. . <br /> <br />. . <br /> <br />plan. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . <br /> <br />Estimated vegetation losses (acres) associated <br />with canal lining . . . . . . . . . . . . . <br />Common nongame birds and their habitat in the <br />Uinta Basin Unit area . . . . . . . . . . . . . . <br />Unemployment percentages for Duchesne County <br />and the State of Utah . . . . . . . . . . . . . . <br />Average monthly wage of nonagricultural employees <br />in recent years . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . <br />Population projections for Duchesne County with <br />and without the recommended plan <br />Estimated direct employment and income from <br />recommended plan. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . <br />Projected school-age population for selected <br />year, no action alternative . . . . . . . . . . . <br />Projected medical personnel and facilities <br />required for selected years, no-action <br />alternative . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . <br />Projected demand for housing units in the project <br /> <br />. . <br /> <br />area. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . <br /> <br />. . <br /> <br />Developments included in cumulative impact <br />analysis. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . <br /> <br />. . . <br /> <br />-'" I' l \'~., <br />U v \. -:tv 1 <br /> <br />vi <br /> <br />Page <br /> <br />11 <br /> <br />20 <br />21 <br />22 <br /> <br />32 <br />33 <br />39 <br />42 <br /> <br />48 <br />52 <br />54 <br /> <br />57 <br /> <br />58 <br />62 <br />64 <br />66 <br /> <br />67 <br /> <br />70 <br /> <br />77 <br /> <br />85 <br /> <br />90 <br /> <br />103 <br /> <br />104 <br /> <br />106 <br /> <br />106 <br /> <br />109 <br /> <br />109 <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />111 <br /> <br />118 <br />