Laserfiche WebLink
<br />t\) <br />-..1 <br />0) <br />00 <br /> <br />:\ <br />, <br />:~ <br /> <br />CONTENTS <br /> <br />Page <br /> <br />Metric conversion. <br />Abstract . . . . . <br />Introduction. . . <br />Historical records. <br />Duration data. . . <br />Regression equations of <br />Salt-load computations. <br />Conclusions. . . . . . . . . <br /> <br />iii <br />1 <br />1 <br />2 <br />4 <br />4 <br />4 <br />15 <br /> <br />water-quality data. <br /> <br />ILLUSTRATIONS <br /> <br />Figure 1. Map showing location of streamflow and \"ater-qual ity <br />s tat i on s . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . 3 <br />2. Regression curve of discharge versus specific conductance, <br />09095500 Colorado River near Cameo, Colo. . . . . . . 9 <br />3. Regression curve of specific conductance versus dissolved <br />sol ids, 09095500 Colorado River near Cameo, Colo. . . 10 <br /> <br />Table 1. <br /> 2. <br /> 3. <br /> 4. <br /> 5. <br /> 6. <br /> <br />TABLES <br /> <br />Duration table of daily discharge for.year ending <br />September 30, 09095500 Colorado River near Cameo, Colo.. 5 <br />Duration table of daily specific conductance for year ending <br />September 30, 09095500 Colorado River near Cameo, Colo.. 7 <br />Regression equations for stations in the Grand Valley area, <br />Colorado and Utah. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8 <br />Concentrations, in tons per acre-foot, for stations in the <br />Grand Valley area, using several methods of computation. 12 <br />Salt load, in thousands of tons, for stations in the Grand <br />Valley area, using several methods of computation. . . . 13 <br />Comparison of salt-load increase from the Grand Valley, <br />as computed at 09163530 Colorado River below Colorado-Utah <br />State 1 ine and at 09180500 Colorado River near Cisco, <br />Utah, using different methods of computation. . . . . .. 14 <br /> <br />ii <br /> <br />'. <br /> <br />. <br />, <br /> <br />._....i._._. <br /> <br />-" .-------- - --"- ---- - ~.,_..." ~ <br />