My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
WSP11291
CWCB
>
Water Supply Protection
>
Backfile
>
11000-11999
>
WSP11291
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/26/2010 3:16:51 PM
Creation date
10/12/2006 4:52:16 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Water Supply Protection
File Number
8281.960
Description
Colorado River Studies and Investigations -- Lower Colorado Comprehensive Framework Study
Basin
Colorado Mainstem
Water Division
5
Date
6/1/1971
Title
Lower Colorado Region Comprehensive Framework Study -- Appendix XII - Recreation
Water Supply Pro - Doc Type
Report/Study
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
9
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br /> <br />o <br /> <br />Rights" has been proposed among members of <br />Congress. A Federal commission on population <br />problems has been created and Federal land use <br />planning and zoning legislation has been intro- <br />duced. A host of Federal bills have been intro- <br />duced and some enacted regarding air, land, noise <br />and water pollution. Apparently, a whole new <br />approach to coping with environmental problems is <br />emerging. The Advisory Commission on Arizona's <br />Environment gives voice to some of these problems. <br />Citizens, public officials and State legislators, <br />however, must give greater support to enacting <br />progressive legislation establishing an effective <br />environmental control program. <br /> <br />('-; <br /> <br />t- <br />10- <br />..... <br />~ <br /> <br />Most of the effort to date has been concerned with <br />objectiyesand goals of the States and Nation. <br />In many instances these goals and objectives have <br />not been fUlly incorporated into the recreation <br />planning field. Currently, programs are largely <br />justified from the viewpoint of their multiple <br />purposes. This approach is integrally tied to the <br />benefit-cost method used to evaluate the desirabi- <br />lity of a project, justifY its cost and assign <br />it a priority. The multiple purposes of projects, <br />whether freeways, urban renewal, water development <br />or flood control are largely based on economic <br />benefits and oftentimes on only the more obvious <br />economic benefits. Goals, on the other hand, quite <br />often have to do with qualitative and intangible <br />benefits. <br /> <br />The .need for open space and desirable patterns of <br />settlement, for instance, are goals that work <br />against certain types of urban expansion and <br />economic development. Water resource projects, <br />highways and other public works frequently result <br />in growth and increasing population. The apparent <br />confl;i.ct is real enough, but remains unexpressed. <br />Until open space and environmental goals are <br />definitively identified, they cannot be included in <br />the planning and decision making process. We must <br />undertake to identifY our goals and make them an <br />integral part of both our planning and action. <br /> <br />i <br />:i <br />~ <br />,';; <br />.1 <br /> <br />Hi <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.