My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
WSP11289
CWCB
>
Water Supply Protection
>
Backfile
>
11000-11999
>
WSP11289
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/26/2010 3:16:50 PM
Creation date
10/12/2006 4:52:14 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Water Supply Protection
File Number
8200.300.40.A
Description
Colorado River Compact
Basin
Colorado Mainstem
Date
11/24/1922
Author
Co. R Compact Comm.
Title
Minutes of Colorado Compact Commission - Meeting #26
Water Supply Pro - Doc Type
Publication
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
25
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />2(0 <br /> <br />then before the word "rights'" should be the vrord "such"; "thon claims, if <br /> <br />any, of such rights" would make it plain if that is the intent, <br /> <br /> <br />JUDGE DAVIS: In reference to the second paragraph, you say the <br /> <br />.~ <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />"other rights'i which is apparontly in countordisttnction to the proferred <br /> <br />. <br />rights mentj.oned in tho first paragraph. That was the thought I had, <br /> <br />CHllll.'MAI'J HOOVER: It might be botter in that sense, It mig)1t give <br /> <br />clarity, <br /> <br />MR, NORvmt: I think thG word "8..1 chi!: ou"ht to ,,0 befere "claj.ms'li and <br /> <br />cut out, ";if any," <br /> <br />. . <br /> <br />JUDGE SLOi\IJ: "Claims of such rights " would be botter, That <br /> <br />would involve the idea of valid claims, of course, <br /> <br />MR. NORVIEL: And cut out the "if any,'" <br /> <br />JUDGE DAVIS: No. <br /> <br />* <br /> <br />. CHAlRMAN HOOVER: Put in the "if any" after "!rights." <br /> <br />. JUDGE DAVIS: "Claims of such rights, if any" would r Gad better, yes. <br /> <br />.. <br /> <br />MR, .EMERSON: ill that second paragraph, Lthinlt we ought to repeat the <br /> <br /> <br />v!orc!s "of the Colorado River System'" in order to make it clear. <br /> <br />MR, CARPEl-ITER: . 'rhat last line is rough for me, I don It understand <br />, <br /> <br />mysolf what .it means and I fOLlr ethers wen't. Thii3 is the, thought, I <br /> <br />supposed, wished to be exprossqd, that the waters so. stored shall be waters <br /> <br /> <br />duo the I,Qwer .Basin on its apportionment;; but. it sooras to l11e ;thetheught <br /> <br /> <br />of storec;l water is more er less confused vrith the ;~dea of apportionment _ <br /> <br />that. the water so stored is a part of the apportionment to that Basin. <br /> <br /> <br />JL'DGE DAVIS: It seems to me under the previous articles of the <br /> <br />compac,t :that vfO,tor storod must be vrithin the .apportio.nment anyway. <br /> <br />MR. EMERSON: Wouldn't this languago covorit;"from tho water <br /> <br />apportioned in ArticlG III that shall be so stored,lII <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />"" <br /> <br />MR. CARPENTER:.l am keeping in view the fact that the water stored <br /> <br />for the Lowe!' Basin might be needed in the Upper Basin, . <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.