My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
WSP11270
CWCB
>
Water Supply Protection
>
Backfile
>
11000-11999
>
WSP11270
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/26/2010 3:16:45 PM
Creation date
10/12/2006 4:51:55 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Water Supply Protection
File Number
8273.500
Description
Colorado River Basin Salinity Control - Federal Agencies - EPA
Basin
Colorado Mainstem
Water Division
5
Date
1/1/1990
Title
EPA - Rural Clean Water Program - RCWP
Water Supply Pro - Doc Type
Report/Study
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
32
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />~ <br />uJ <br />a <br />o <br /> <br />I, <br /> <br /> <br />docum~nting changes in ground-water qualiity and response to <br />geologic stratigraphy. <br /> <br />o Consistency and uniformity in data collection, analysis, and <br />reporting over the project timeframe are essential for detecting <br />water quality trends and associating them with working BMPs. <br />All mo~itoring programs should include an effective and reliable <br />quality assurance/quality control plan. <br /> <br />, 0 Location of the water quality monitoring stations must comple- <br />ment BM'P implementation if BMPsare to be associated with <br />changes inwater quality. . <br />The Michigan, Vermont, Idaho, Utah, Virginia, Pennsylvania, ' <br />and FIQrida RCWPs have found that monitoring sub-basins <br />within the overall project area is a more effective strategy than <br />monitoring only at the watershed outlet. Water quality changes <br />are mol,e likely to appear at the sub-basin level closer to land <br />treatment areas where the effects of external factors, other pol- <br />lution spurces, complex hydrology, and scattered BMP im- <br />plementation are minimized. It is still important to locate <br />monitoring stations at the watershed outlet to document chan- <br />ges occlJrring at the watershed level and in the resource with <br />the original water quality impairment, such as a lake. <br /> <br />o Monitoring of biological and habitat indicators are also ap- <br />propriate for nonpoint source control projects. <br />Five projects (Idaho, Illinois, Nebraska, South Dakota, and <br />Vermont) have extensively monitored biological and habitat <br />variable, to assess water quality. Idaho has measured improve- <br />ments in stream habitat and aquatic life, as well as increased <br />trout numbers and size in Rock Creek since the RCWP began. <br />These rElsults have been used to stimulate public interest in the <br />project. <br /> <br />9 <br /> <br />Electrofishlng is a technique used to ., <br />obtain a direct measl.ire off/shery qualify. . <br /> <br />, ~i, <br />, <br />, <br />"_! <br /> <br />. ; ~ <br /> <br />,f <br /> <br />" .,<~ <br />,'j <br /> <br />,'. - <br />,:!' <br />-& <br /> <br />-ii <br /> <br />01 <br /> <br />, <br />I <br /> <br />:-1 <br />:1 <br />-', <br />:;~ <br />i <br />:;i <br />J <br />,:) <br />',1 <br /> <br />;, <br /> <br />, <br />i <br />A <br />, <br />.j: <br />j <br />-,~' <br /> <br />- -;; <br /> <br />,~i <br />.{ <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.