Laserfiche WebLink
<br />. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />1905 <br /> <br />E. Water Right not Acquired <br /> <br />The operating principles identified certain district direct flOl' water rights <br />that were to be assigned to the District. The water represented by the rights <br />was to become a part of the water supply to serve the authorized project acreage <br />of 19,717 acres. The rights of eleven (11) ditches were included totaling 656 <br />cubic feet per second. In return, the District was to provide a water supply <br />for project lands composed of the following acreage under individual ditches: <br /> <br />Baca <br />Chil i 1 i <br />E 1 Mora <br />Johns Flood <br />Model <br />South Si de <br />Victor Florez <br />Hoehne <br />Burns & Ducan <br />Lewelhing & McCormick <br />Salas <br /> <br />2,428 acres <br />114 acres <br />160 acres <br />1,854 acres <br />6,177 acres <br />6,359 acres <br />22 acres <br />1,742 acres <br />322 acres <br />378 acres <br />161 acres <br /> <br />19,717 acres <br /> <br />Not all of the original individual ditches have assigned their rights to the <br />Di stri ct. Three ditches; Salas, Burns & Ducan, and Vi ctor Florez have withhe 1 d <br />a portion or all of their rights from the project. Since the water available to <br />the project has been reduced by the amount of these water rights, the total <br />acreage irri9ated by project water needs to' be reduced accordingly. The amount <br />of reduction may be considered to be the same as the amount of land irrigated by <br />the withheld water; computed to be 278 acres (Table 13). This acreage is <br />based on the rat io of the amount of the water ri ght. That is, if the water <br />right were 6.0 cubic feet per second and withdrawal amount was 2.75 cubic feet <br />per second, then the acreage was reduced by 46 percent (2.75/6.00 = .46). <br /> <br />F. Headgate Diversions <br /> <br />In the 1961 Study the average annual consumpt i ve use for the 1925-57 study <br />period was computed by the Lowry-Johnson method and determined to be equal to <br />2.30 acre-feet per acre. Considering the average annual precipitation along <br />with farm 1 asses and canal and 1 atera 1 losses at 30 percent each, the average <br />annual headgate requirement was computed to be 3.10 acre-feet per acre or 61,200 <br />acre-feet for the 19,717 acres. Since the project plan provided for including <br />the precipitation that falls on the project irrigated lands in the determination <br />of the headgate requirement the actual headgate requirement will vary from year <br />to year depending on the amount of precipitation. <br /> <br />Page 7 of the 1961 Study states "Under proper water administration, it is <br />assumed irrigation headgate diversions with Trinidad Reservoir in operation <br />would be limited at all times to ideal crop requirements in order to minimize <br />the prOject effect on downstream water users." Article IV-B-2 of the Operating <br />Principles states that "All water deliveries to the 19,717 acres of District <br />irrigable area will be limited during the irrigation season to the irrigation <br />requirements at the farm headgates as determined by the District." <br /> <br />42 <br /> <br /> <br />I <br />. <br />II <br />. <br />I <br /> <br /> <br />I <br />