Laserfiche WebLink
<br />. .. l. ..-'.'H..'-' "~ <br /> <br />EffECTS OF <br />MARTIN <br /> <br />YEAR <br /> <br />1925 <br />1926 <br />1927 <br />;ll 1928 <br />1929 <br /> <br />1930 <br />1931 <br />1932 <br />1933 <br />1934 <br /> <br />w <br />~ <br /> <br />1935 <br />1936 <br />1937 <br />1938 <br />1939 <br /> <br />1940 <br />1941 <br />21 1942 <br />211943 <br />1944 <br /> <br />1945 <br />1946 <br />21 1947 <br />2J 1948 <br />1949 <br /> <br />1950 <br />1951 <br />1952 <br />1953 <br />1954 <br /> <br />1955 <br />1956 <br />1957 <br /> <br />AVE <br /> <br />TRINIOAO PROJECT 11 <br />tilE TRINIDAD PROvECT 01',1 USEABLE INFLOW TO <br />RESERVOIR COMPARED TO HISTORICAL CONDtTON <br />(UNITS = 1.000 ACRE-FEET) <br /> <br />1961 <br /> <br />5.2 <br />4.2 <br />-5.8 <br />-0.7' <br />-0.4 <br /> <br />2.7 <br />4.5 <br />1.2 <br />4.1 <br />0.7 <br /> <br />0.5 <br />3.0 <br />-4.2 <br />-0.1 <br />-2.7 <br /> <br />1.8 <br />8.0 <br />1.5 <br />1.9 <br />1.1 <br /> <br />-0.5 <br />2.2 <br />-2.7 <br />2.6 <br />-2.6 <br /> <br />3.3 <br />6.9 <br />-2.7 <br />0.3 <br />1.9 <br /> <br />-6.3 <br />5.5 <br />0.6 <br /> <br />lH <br />BASE- <br />LINE <br /> <br />8.2 <br />3.0 <br />-1. 1 <br />1.0 <br />0.8 <br /> <br />3.3 <br />3.3 <br />1.1 <br />3.7 <br />2.2 <br /> <br />0.0 <br />5.3 <br />-2,6 <br />0.4 <br />-1.3 <br /> <br />0.8 <br />8.2 <br />1.2 <br />3.6 <br />3.1 <br /> <br />-1.0 <br />2.6 <br />-0.4 <br />2.0 <br />0.5 <br /> <br />4.9 <br />4.0 <br />-3.5 <br />1.8 <br />2.1 <br /> <br />-3.6 <br />5.4 <br />-0.1 <br /> <br />1.1 <br /> <br />5H <br />NOWBP <br /> <br />8.2 <br />-1.7 <br />-0.2 <br />-0.6 <br />0.6 <br /> <br />2.4 <br />-3.2 <br />2.3 <br />5.4 <br />2.2 <br /> <br />0.0 <br />~.3 <br />-2.7 <br />-2.3 <br />-1.0 <br /> <br />0.9 <br />1.0 <br />-2.7 <br />3.6 <br />-1. 1 <br /> <br />-1. 1 <br />2.4 <br />-3.3 <br />-1.4 <br />-2.3 <br /> <br />4.8 <br />4.6 <br />-4.0 <br />1.9 <br />2.1 <br /> <br />-4.6 <br />5.4 <br />-1.4 <br /> <br />1.8 <br /> <br />lH <br />NOBP <br /> <br />8.2 <br />3.0 <br />-1.0 <br />0.8 <br />0.6 <br /> <br />3.3 <br />3.8 <br />1.0 <br />3.1 <br />1.4 <br /> <br />-1.0 <br />5.3 <br />-2.3 <br />0.5 <br />-1.6 <br /> <br />O.a <br />7.6 <br />1.2 <br />3.6 <br />3.1 <br /> <br />-1.6 <br />2.2 <br />. 0.4 <br />1.9 <br />0.3 <br /> <br />4.2 <br />4.1 <br />-3.7 <br />2.0 <br />2.1 <br /> <br />-4.0 <br />5.2 <br />-0.9 <br /> <br />0.6 <br /> <br />5H <br />NOBP <br /> <br />8.2 <br />-2.0 <br />-0.1 <br />-0.8 <br />0.3 <br /> <br />2.5 <br />-3.0 <br />2.2 <br />5.0 <br />1.4 <br /> <br />-1.0 <br />5.3 <br />-3.4 <br />-3.0 <br />-0.8 <br /> <br />1.0 <br />1.2 <br />-2.7 <br />3.6 <br />-0.9 <br /> <br />-1.6 <br />2.5 <br />-3.8 <br />-0.1 <br />-1.9 <br /> <br />4.5 <br />4.7 <br />-3.9 <br />2.0 <br />2.1 <br /> <br />-5.1 <br />5.3 <br />-2.4 <br /> <br />1.6 <br /> <br />5H39 <br />NOBP <br /> <br />8.2 <br />-2.0 <br />-0.1 <br />-0.8 <br />0.3 <br /> <br />0.6 <br />-7.1 <br />2.3 <br />6.7 <br />2.3 <br /> <br />-0.9 <br />5.3 <br />-3.4 <br />-3.0 <br />-0.8 <br /> <br />1.0 <br />1.2 <br />-2.7 <br />3.6 <br />-0.9 <br /> <br />-1.6 <br />4.4 <br />-2.0 <br />-6.6 <br />-0.3 <br /> <br />5.3 <br />6.5 <br />-3.1 <br />2.0 <br />2.1 <br /> <br />-5.1 <br />5.3 <br />-2.4 <br /> <br />0.5 <br /> <br />J1. EFFECT OF TRINIDAD PROJECT ON JOHN MARTIN INFLOW DURING MONTHS OF SPILL ELIMINATED. <br />2J YEARS OF JOHN MARTIN RESERVOIR SPilL. <br /> <br />,JOHN <br /> <br />PAGE 2 OF 2 <br /> <br />5H39 <br />NOWBP <br /> <br />8.2 <br />-1.7 <br />-0.2 <br />-0.6 <br />0.6 <br /> <br />2.4 <br />-4.9 <br />2.4 <br />5.8 <br />2.4 <br /> <br />0.0 <br />5.3 <br />-2.7 <br />-2.3 <br />-1.0 <br /> <br />0.9 <br />1.0 <br />-2.7 <br />3.6 <br />-1.0 <br /> <br />-1. 1 <br />4.2 <br />-1.4 <br />-6.1 <br />-1.2 <br /> <br />5.6 <br />6.4 <br />-3.3 <br />2.0 <br />2.1 <br /> <br />-4.6 <br />5.4 <br />-1.4 <br /> <br />0.4 <br /> <br />0.2 <br /> <br /> <br />TABLE e <br /> <br />.....' <br />OJ <br />(.0 <br /> <br />w- ,.. <br />